A Simple Truth

“You can’t become financially independent with someone else’s money.” – Farnoosh Torabi of the So Money Podcast

The frankness of this statement amazed me.

While being interviewed by Jamila Souffrant at Journey to Launch, Ms. Torabi spoke of the need for women to control their own money. She posited that a woman without her own money could not truly be independent of someone else for her financial security.

I’ve been thinking about this idea for a while now, and I believe it wholeheartedly. A woman without her own money will always be dependent on someone else for her financial security – a parent, a spouse, the state. It’s not a great way to live, yet for millions of us it is a reality that we accept as easily as we accept that the sun rises in the east every morning.

Women who control their own money aren’t as rare as they once were but they’re not as common as they should be either. One of my friends was married to a very good-looking man who decided to stray. She decided that she wouldn’t tolerate that particular decision and they divorced. One of the reasons why she could make that decision was because she holds a professional degree. Her education allowed her to secure her own financial future – she could pay the mortgage, the nanny, the divorce lawyer, and all the costs associated with being a single mother raising babies. From a financial perspective, my friend was very okay because she was and continues to be financially independent. She doesn’t have to depend on anyone else’s money to live the life she wants to live.

Full disclosure – I’m a Singleton. While I hear about the debate between married people who share all of their money and the married people who keep things separate, it’s an academic discussion to me. I’ve never had to seriously consider whether I would share my money with another person.

Additional disclosure – the idea of sharing my money makes my stomach turn. And when I’ve considered why I’m so against the idea of co-mingling my money, it’s because I view that decision as increasing my risk instead of increasing my security. If I were a Singleton living paycheque-to-paycheque, or living in debt, then the idea of sharing another person’s wealth might be quite attractive. Similarly, if I could be certain that a partner’s views of money were compatible with my own and that he had also built up a nice-sized war chest while a Singleton, then the concept of a joint bank account wouldn’t cause so much anxiety for me.

Even without hearing it articulated, I’ve always known that having control of my money has meant that I retained the power to make independent choices about how to live my life. Since leaving my parents’ home, I’ve never had to ask for permission to spend a single dollar. I’ve never had to discuss a purchase with another person because the money was mine. I’ve never had to compromise with anyone about how to invest my money.

You see, I’ve always understood that having control of my money meant having more control over my future financial well-being. Even if I was married to the kindest, gentlest, most wonderful human being on the planet who took care of my every financial need, there’s no guarantee from anyone or anything that my Wonderful Human would be there forever. People die – people leave – people get kidnapped – people get sick – employment disappears – businesses fail – etc, etc, etc… If any of those things were to happen to my Wonderful Human, I would not want to be in a position where I had to worry about money while also dealing with the emotional grief that would inevitably accompany that loss.

By the same token, I always knew that I didn’t want to be forced to stay in a relationship just because of money. I didn’t want to be financially dependent on someone who was abusive to me, or who didn’t treat me kindly. I wanted to have the ability to walk away from any relationship that didn’t work anymore, or that wasn’t giving me what I needed. I never wanted to be financially dependent on anyone else because that would mean that they controlled my financial future. If they had the power to make the financial decisions for my life, then I would forever have to wonder when, or if, they would take away their financial largesse and give it to someone else.

I accept that there are no guarantees in life. However, I also accept that women can take steps with their money to build a solid financial foundation for themselves and that they should not look to others for financial security. Having money of her own means that a woman can make choices for her own best interests without worrying about how to accommodate the wishes of someone else. A woman with money can leave a bad situation, a bad job, a bad relationship without worrying how to feed, shelter, clothe herself. Money gives women the option to finance the basic necessities that they need without requiring them to depend on anyone else.

Ms. Torabi is right – you cannot become financially independent if you’re relying on someone else’s money.

Priorities vs. Right Now

What are your priorities for your money?

I’m not asking to be airy-fairy. It’s simply been my observation that people who know what their priorities are allocate their money in a way that ensures that their priorities are met.

Speaking for myself, saving for a comfortable – and hopefully early! – retirement has been one my priorities for the past 15 years. So in addition to devouring early retirement blogs and learning about investing, I have made it a priority to save a big chunk of my paycheque and to allocate it towards my retirement fund. That chunk varies between 41%-42% of my take-home pay.

Those of you who follow personal finance blogs know that living on half of your income is considered the Holy Grail, while saving more than 50% is even better.

In a perfect world, I’d be able to save half of my take-home pay. However, we don’t live in a perfect world and I have other financial priorities. I’m willing to spend a little bit of my money now to enjoy my life between today and retirement.

One of those other priorities of mine is travel…hence some of the magnificent pictures that you’ll find at the top of my blog posts. All of scenic pictures on this website are from my own little camera! (Check out the Sagrada Familia above – it’s in Barcelona. You should go see it!) The world is a big place, but I’m already in my 40s so I won’t see all of it before I die. My goal is to visit and see as many of places that interest me before I shuffle off this mortal coil, Shakespeare-style.

This year, my house is nudging its way up my priority list. I love my home, but it’s a never-ending source of expenditure, even though it no longer has a mortgage on it. In addition to property taxes, insurance, and utilities, there’s the pesky and recurring issue of maintenance and renovations. Believe me when I tell you that I’m not renovating because of some awe-inspiring episode of Renovate-This-And-That which I happened to see on HGTV.

Nope – my house needs to be renovated so that it doesn’t fall apart. I’ve been setting aside money for a major renovation, so that means a different priority will be pushed down my list until next year when – knock on wood! – I won’t have to do anything major to my house.

See, that’s the thing about priorities. You can have way more than one, but they need to be put in order and that order can change. However, if you know what your priorities are, you’re halfway down the path to allocating your money in a way that facilitates your ability to satisfy all of them.

If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride! This is an old-fashioned phrase that has withstood the test of time because of its unassailable accuracy. It’s just a fancy way of saying that wishing for something isn’t enough to make it come true. It’s also a not-so-subtle way of recognizing that people need money to make their wishes come true.

I firmly believe that everyone has spending priorities. It’s just that some people are conscious about them, while other people aren’t. Have you ever known someone who has talked for years and years and years about doing some particular thing but they never actually get around to doing it, presumably due to a lack of money? And does this person you know always seem to have money for a coffee, a meal away from home, a pack of cigarettes, a whatever-item-you-can-imagine?

It’s funny how they never seem to make any headway on what they say that they really want to do…

You want to know a secret?

It’s this – whatever it is that they say they want to do isn’t what they really want to do. What they really want to do is spend their money Right Now. They make the choice to spend Right Now instead of taking a chunk of money and setting it aside for their alleged priorities.

Their truest priority is the Right Now, whether they know it or not!!! Their truest priority is whatever they want at that moment – the coffee, the meal out, the cigarettes, the whatever. That’s where they are spending their money. That immediate purchase represents what is most important to them right then and there.

What about you? Have you figured out what your priorities are for your life? Are you spending your money in a way that gets your closer to your conscious priorities?

You only have so much time. Wouldn’t it be better to spend your time pursuing your priorities so that you’re doing what you want with your life?

Is the higher MER worth it?

Cherished Readers, I have come to an uneasy decision and I’m not sure if I’m right.

I used to buy units in the XDV exchange traded fund (ETF) issued by iShares. When Vanguard came to Canada, I stopped buying units in XDV and started buying units in VDY. Why did I make the switch? Both ETFs satisfied my desire to build my army of money soldiers by making regular monthly purchases through my brokerage account. However, the MER for VDY was 0.22% while the MER for XDV was 0.55%. I listened to the wisdom of the Internet and decided that I should only pay the lower MER for essentially the same product.

Except….

It’s been two years since I started buying units in VDY. The monthly dividend payment per unit varies wildly, and I haven’t been able to figure out why. Both the VDY and the XDV are Canadian-based dividend products, which means that there is a great deal of overlap between their holdings. Yet, my XDV dividend payment is relatively consistent from one month to the next. The VDY dividend payment varies wildly – one month, it’s $0.13/unit and the next month it’s $0.05/unit. On the flip side, the XDV dividend payment is relatively consistent from month to month. It may be $0.087/unit for three months, then fall to $0.078/unit for a few months, before going back up again. There are never wild gyrations from one month to the next, so my monthly dividend cheque stays roughly the same or increases a little bit due to the acquisition of new units via my dividend re-investment plan (DRIP).

Given that one of my goals is to be able to live off my dividend payments, I prefer some reliability in the amount of money that I’ll be getting from one month to the next.

So my uneasy decision is this. Starting with my next contribution, I will go back to buying units in XDV even though it will mean paying an extra 0.33% in MERs to do so. I spent a little time with my calculator on a recent trip out of town and I figured out that if I had stuck to buying units in XDV over the past two years, instead of switching to VDY, I would be earning an extra $300 per month in dividends on top of what I’m earning now. That’s not enough to live on, but it certainly would be enough to buy a month’s worth of groceries for this Singleton.

So my question remains – is the higher MER worth it? The more dividends I earn each month, the faster they can compound through my DRIP, and the sooner I can reach my target of earning atleast $2000/month in dividends by the time I retire.

Is it really so bad to spend an extra 0.33% in MERs if doing so allows me to meet my goals on the timeline that I’ve set for myself?

***************************

Cherished Readers, I have changed my mind. This is allowed because a wrong decision should be corrected as soon as possible in order to mitigate any negative consequences. I will continue to buy my VDY units at Vanguard even though the monthly dividend payment will most likely continue to fluctuate wildly. I calculated the average monthly dividend payment per unit of both investment products and realized that the average VDY payment per unit is higher. It’s the best of both worlds – a lower MER and a higher average monthly dividend payment per unit.

There’s nothing I can do about the fluctuations – that’s utterly out of my control. However, I can continue to purchase units in VDY each month. Eventually, I will have just as many units in VDY as I do in XDV. At that point, my regularly anticipated amount of monthly dividends will be higher – barring any dividend cuts from the underlying companies – and the fluctuations won’t have as much impact on my monthly budget.

For all of my reading and learning about personal finance and financial products over the years, I’ve yet to find a single article that explains the ins-and-outs of how funds distribute their money. I can appreciate that payments are going to be different where the underlying assets comprising the ETFs (or index funds and mutual funds) are quite diverse. In my case, the underlying assets comprising my two ETFs – VDY and XDV – are almost identical. So how come their monthly dividend payments vary so damn much?