What is a HELOC?

What is a Home Equity Line Of Credit? Short answer – it’s a debt trap that’s best avoided.

At its heart, a HELOC is a debt product that banks offer to homeowners which permits the homeowner to go into debt by spending the equity in their home without selling it first.

For example, if you have $200,000 worth of equity in your home, you can get a HELOC for an amount up to $200,000 depending on the lender. Without a HELOC, you would have to sell your home to get your hands on the equity. In other words, someone would give you money in exchange for your house and you could then spend that money however you wanted. There would be no fees or interest payable on that money because it would be yours.

The HELOC is a completely different beast. With a HELOC, you get access to the equity in your home via a loan from the bank without first having to sell your home. This sounds like a good thing, but it’s a debt-trap that you would be wise to avoid.

Banks charge interest on outstanding HELOC balances

You must keep in mind that the banks will charge you interest if you use a HELOC. Again, you’re spending your equity via a loan from the bank. Any bank loan is accompanied by an interest payment. Interest accrues until such time as the HELOC balance is repaid in full and it runs from the moment that you use it.

The interest rate on a HELOC is usually lower than the interest rate charged on a regular Line Of Credit. A regular LOC is an unsecured product, whereas your home secures the HELOC. If you don’t pay back your LOC, the bank cannot initiate foreclosure proceedings and take your home away from you. This is why they charge you a higher interest rate on a LOC.

Banks can foreclose on you if you don’t repay your HELOC

Before extending you a HELOC, the bank puts a charge on the title to your home. This charge against your title is similar to a mortgage. It ensures that if you ever sell your home, the bank’s HELOC will be repaid from the proceeds of the sale. You’ll get whatever’s leftover after the mortgage debt and the HELOC debt have been repaid.

Again, this particular debt product is essentially a loan against your home. It allows you to spend the equity in your home however you want. No one will be watching you to ensure that you don’t spend your equity on items which will not increase your financial security.

Having a charge on your title makes you vulnerable. Should you fail to make your monthly payment on the outstanding HELOC balance, the bank has the right to foreclose on your home to get its money back. Also, the bank has the right to demand full repayment on an outstanding HELOC balance whenever it wants. If you can’t repay the balance when asked, the bank has the right to foreclose on your home to get its money back.

Let’s say that your housing market goes down and the amount of equity in your home drops simultaneously. You house used to be worth $350,000 but now it’s only worth $250,000. Effectively , you’ve lost $100,000 worth of equity in your home. The bank may get nervous because their loan to you, in the form of the HELOC, is no longer backed by an asset that can fully repay the outstanding balance. The bank may decide to cut its losses, which means that they will demand full repayment of the outstanding loan balance. Should you not repay that balance, then the bank can proceed to foreclosure in order to get its money back before all of the equity in your home disappears due to market conditions.

HELOCs facilitate the siphoning of your home equity in dribs and drabs

When you use a HELOC, you are spending the equity in your home instead of increasing it. You are increasing the debt owed on your home each time you spend its equity.

One of the most dangerous ways to use a HELOC is to have it attached to your debit card. There is nothing stopping you from spending your home’s equity on mundane items. Think of trips to the coffeeshop, to purchase concert / sports tickets, to buy clothes, to finance your daily life. If you need a HELOC to survive from on paycheque to the next, then you’re living above your means. You’re working your way into a severe debt trap. Figure out how to free yourself and stop digging a bigger debt hole.

If there is ever a good use for a HELOC, it’s to make major repairs to your home that are required for your safety, i.e. replacing the furnace or the roof.

There is nothing wrong with you spending your home equity on the costs of your daily life if you need to. Just don’t do it via a HELOC! The wiser course of action is to sell your house and get the cash. That way, the entire amount of your home’s equity is available for your life’s expenses. You won’t be paying interest and fees to the bank for the privilege of spending your own money. You won’t run the risk of foreclosure. You won’t be indebted to the bank. And the money is still yours to spend as you wish.

RRSP Season

It’s Registered Retirement Savings Plan season! From now until the last day of February, there will many advertisements all over the place exhorting you to make a contribution to your RRSP.

If you need more detailed information about the rules, then I would suggest that you visit the website for the Canada Revenue Agency. Alternatively, you can talk to your accountant or a financial advisor. This article does not in any way, shape or form constitute comprehensive accounting or legal advice about RRSPs. I am not a professional nor am I giving you any kind of investing advice. This post is a starting point for you to make inquiries, learn the basics, and take responsibility for your future by determining how to use RRSPs to your best advantage.

For my part, I really like RRSPs. I’ve been contributing to mine since I was 21 years old. Every year, I get a tax refund which is promptly re-invested for retirement or put towards an annual vacation. I’m very diligent about automatic transfers to my investment portfolio so I’m quite comfortable with spending my RRSP-generated tax refund on whatever my heart desires.

RRSPs offer tax-deferred growth. You can pick almost any kind of investment to put under the tax-deferred umbrella. On top of that, you might even qualify for a tax refund if you make a contribution. If you’re in a higher tax bracket when you put money in than when you take it out, you’ve saved money on both sides of the transaction.

Remember – it’s tax-deferred savings, not tax-free savings. If you contribute when you’re in the 33% tax bracket, then your tax refund is based on that tax bracket. If you’re in a lower tax bracket when you take the money out, say the 26% tax bracket for instance, then you’ll pay tax on that RRSP withdrawal at 26%. This means you’ll be 7% to the good. Woohoo!

In my humble opinion, RRSPs have many commendable benefits.

However, not every product is perfect. RRSP contribution room can be lost if you make a contribution and then withdraw the money outside of two very specific RRSP programs. Those programs are the Lifelong Learners Plan or the HomeBuyer’s Plan. In short, if you contribute $1000 to your RRSP and then withdraw that money outside of the aforementioned programs, then you cannot put that money back into your RRSP in the future. Unlike the Tax Free Savings Account, which allows for contribution room to be re-captured if a withdrawal is made, your RRSP contribution room is gone forever once you withdraw your money.

Another associated drawback to RRSPs, in certain circumstances, is the creation of a nemesis commonly known as D-E-B-T.

“How can an RRSP result in debt?” you ask.

It’s quite simple. At this time of year, banks love to give people RRSP loans. Customers borrow money, contribute to their RRSP, and then they’re supposed to use the tax refund to pay down the RRSP loan. Whether the tax refund is actually applied to the outstanding balance on the RRSP loan is anyone’s guess. The tax refund goes straight to the borrower who took out the loan and it can be used however the borrower wants it to be used. Concert tickets? Holiday? Extra mortgage payment? Cigarettes? The choice is limited only by the borrower’s imagination and common sense. There’s no requirement for the tax refund to pay down the RRSP loan.

In my humble opinion, failing to pay down the loan with the tax refund is most likely a stupid move because do you know what else belongs to the borrower? The loan payments! If the tax refund is spent on something other than the RRSP loan, the loan payments still have to be made because the borrower put himself into debt by taking out the loan in the first place!

Even if the tax refund is applied towards the RRSP loan, trust me when I say that the refund won’t be enough to cover the principal of the loan which means that the borrower is on the hook for the remaining balance of the loan.

Keep in mind that the banks aren’t lending you money interest-free. They might defer the interest on the first 90-days of the loan, in the expectation that you’ll apply any tax refund towards the debt, but don’t hold your breath. Way back in the Palaeolithic period when I worked for a financial institution, this is what my overlords did for the customers. I have no idea if this is still the practice. However, if you can’t repay the loan in full within the grace period, then you will be paying interest on your RRSP loan until it’s completely repaid.

The other big drawback to the RRSP loan is that it, more often than not, requires more RRSP loans in the future if a person is intent on funding their RRSP each year. A cycle of debt is created – this is bad. See, if you’re required to make loan payments on this year’s loan, then you’re most likely not setting money aside for next year’s RRSP contribution. If you had set aside the money in the first place, then there would not have been any reason for you to have taken out an RRSP loan. Following this logic, when next year’s RRSP season rolls around, then you’ll be more inclined to take out another loan to make your next contribution.

This is an ass-backwards way to set aside money for the future. Yes – make the RRSP contribution. No – do not go into debt to do it!

“So what’s your bright idea, Blue Lobster?” you ask.

It’s simple. Go to any bank’s RRSP loan calculator and enter your numbers. The calculator will spit out a loan payment amount. I want you to set up a transfer from your bank account to your RRSP in the amount of the loan payment. Maybe the calculator spits out a payment amount of $500/mth. If your budget can accommodate this number, great – contribute $500 to your RRSP every month like clockwork. Maybe your budget can only tolerate a monthly hit of $350. That’s fine too – you’ll contribute $350 to your RRSP each month.

The point is that instead of paying money and interest to the bank, I want you to contribute that money to your RRSP. If you were willing to pay the bank some interest for the privilege of borrowing money, then I see no reason why you won’t make interest-free payments to yourself.

Either way, you’ll be setting aside money for your future. Why not do so without going into debt?

Pay cash for your cars

Buying a new vehicle is not a decision to be undertaken lightly since the financial ramifications can put a serious crimp in your cash flow for a very long time if you’re not careful.

Check out this article on how Canadians are taking out lengthy car loans to minimize the monthly payment. Think about it for a minute. Canadians want expensive vehicles and they’re willing to finance them, but the required minimum monthly payment over a 5-year period is simply too much for their budgets to bear so they agree to repay the loan over 7, 8 or even 9 years! These kind of lengthy repayment periods are lunacy! Like eating too much of your favourite dessert, long-term loans promise delight in the short-term and guarantee regret over the long-term.

Vehicles are expensive! A brand-new pickup truck in my corner of world can run $70,000 or more. Brand new SUVs start around $25,000. Luxury sedans start at the $39,000 mark. Even on the second hand market, a nice vehicle with fewer than 100,000kms will run you atleast $10,000. I’ve seen financing offers last as long as 96 months for new vehicles – 96 months is 8 years! It should never take anyone 8 years to pay off a car loan. Depending on the driver, a vehicle may need to be replaced at the end of the 8 years and the whole cycle of paying a car loan has to start again. Or, even worse, a vehicle may have to be replaced before the loan period expires and the old loan value has to be rolled into the loan on the next vehicle.

I’m here to tell you that there is a way to live without car payments, to go years without ever having a car payment while driving cars that you can afford. This fool-proof alternative path to vehicle ownership completely eliminates the need for financing. It’s called paying cash for your vehicle by saving the money before you buy. It’s not a particularly popular method, and the car dealerships will never advocate for this method. You can rest assured that the Ad Man and his trusty sidekick, the Creditor would have fits if great swaths of the population decided to follow this method for purchasing motorized transportation. Yet, I guarantee that this method will work for you every single time. If you save up to pay cash, you will benefit twice by acquiring a vehicle without acquiring any payments!

Nearly twenty years ago, a woman from a book club to which I belonged gave me advice about how to buy a car. It was exceptionally good advice, which is why I still remember it. She said that her grandfather had taught her how to pay cash for all of her vehicles. I was most intrigued!

Essentially, the advice was to save the equivalent of a car payment in a separate account until the next desired vehicle could be purchased with cash. At the time, Book Club Lady was setting aside $350 each month in a bank account dedicated to buying her next car and she planned to do so for five years until she had enough to buy her next vehicle in cash. Bingo-bango! At $350 per month, she’d have $21,000 in place to buy her next vehicle in 5 years. And after she purchased her vehicle, she would continue to set aside the amount of money (or more if she wanted) in the bank so that she would be in a position to pay cash for the next vehicle. Technically, one could argue that she was still making a vehicle payment but so what? The fact was that Book Club Lady was making a payment to herself and she wasn’t paying any interest on a car debt.

How many of us prefer to finance a car and pay interest to a creditor? Don’t be shy! Raise your hand. Yes, you’re in good company. Car companies make oodles of money through their financing divisions. Why? Somehow, we as a populace have decided that cars are to be replaced and upgraded regardless of whether they are still roadworthy. Replacing one financed vehicle with another one is far more important to us, collectively, than preserving our money for a period of time and buying something outright with cold, hard cash.

I speak from experience. I’ve twice bought brand-new vehicles. The first one was held for 7 years, and I took the full five years to pay it off at a rate of $325 per month. The second one still sits in my garage, 10 years old this year. I was smarter the second time around as it only took me 6 months to pay off the loan. Despite the wise advice of the Book Club Lady’s grandfather, I financed both of my cars and didn’t give a single thought to setting aside my former car payment so that I could buy the next car in cash.

Let’s face it – vehicles cost money to buy. We can either pay a lender to finance the vehicle, or we can put ourselves in the shoes of the lender and simply pay the same amount to ourselves. Either way, we’re still getting a vehicle out of the deal.

My 10-year old SUV is not going to run forever, so I’ve finally started a dedicated vehicle-replacement fund. Every two weeks, $250 from my paycheque is set aside for the purpose of buying my next vehicle. I’ve committed to driving my SUV until the wheels fall off, so hopefully they stay firmly in place for atleast the next 5 years. If my SUV fails me before my chosen time, the money in my vehicle replacement fund will serve as a good down payment on the next vehicle or it might be enough to buy me something that I don’t completely and absolutely love but can live with until I have enough cash to get what I really want.

“So how do you get the first vehicle without financing it?”

Good question. The first option is to figure out how to live without a car – ride a bike, take public transit, walk, Uber. Some of these options might work some of the time, but they’re not all free. I harbor no illusions that everyone can live without a car. If you’re a person who needs a vehicle to live the life you want, then you might be stuck with financing the first car. But that doesn’t mean that you finance the best car available! It means that you finance the cheapest car you can find that meets your basic needs. You keep that car payment as low as possible so that you can shovel money into the vehicle replacement fund.

Let’s say you finance a $5,000 over 3 years at 2.99%. Your car payment budget is $350 per month but your required car payment over three years is only $85. You’re not thrilled with the vehicle but it safely takes you from A to B, which is really all a vehicle is supposed to do for you. While you’re paying $85 on your car loan every month, the other $265 (= $350 – $85) is going into your vehicle replacement fund.

At the end of three years, you have $9,540 (= $265 x 12months x 3 years) in the bank to go towards a new car. You can either buy a new vehicle for $9,540 or you can keep driving the first $5,000 car while socking away the full $350 into your car replacement fund. Since the car loan ended after three years, that $85 dollar payment can now be paid to yourself instead of to the lender. If you save $350 per month for two more years, you’ll have $8,400 which can be added to the $9,540 already in place, giving you a total of $17,940 in the bank to buy your next vehicle in cash.

Alternatively, you decide to pay off the 3-year car loan as quickly as possible. At $350 per month, your $5,000 car loan is gone in 14 months. At that point, you continue to pay that $350 to yourself while you get accustomed to a life without debt. At the five year mark, which would be 46 months later, you’d have $16,100 (= $350 x 46 months) in the bank waiting to go towards your next vehicle.

To my way of thinking, you should keep driving the $5000 vehicle until the wheels fall off! In the meantime, you continue to squirrel that $350 away every single month until you need to buy another vehicle. However, some of you will want to get rid of the $5000 car as soon as you can. Who am I to stop you? You’re an adult so buy whatever you want. Just make sure that you pay cash!

Debt is Corrosive to the Creation of Intergenerational Wealth

Debt is a cancer to building intergenerational wealth. The phrase intergenerational wealth conjures up images of the very, very rich who are able to bestow entire empires upon their progeny. Truthfully, the concept doesn’t require anything quite that elaborate. My definition of intergenerational wealth is the ability to provide financial assistance to your offspring in order to help them get ahead as adults. It’s above and beyond that level of sustenance that is legally required of parents. Intergenerational wealth is what you use to assist your child in achieving a better life – financial or otherwise – than the one you’ve had. This type of wealth is created when you’ve acquired assets that can be utilized to fund the major purchases of your child’s life when the time comes.

A few weeks back, I read an article about how black women graduate with the highest amount of student loan debt. It got me thinking. How could these women build wealth for their families if they were saddled with big student loans which required years to repay? And what if they also had mortgages, car loans and credit card debt while carrying student loan burdens? How much money would they have to earn to both pay off all debt and save enough to invest in the family’s future? What kind of impact does debt – student loan or otherwise – have on a parent’s ability to build intergenerational wealth?

My ultimate conclusion was that all debt is an inhibitor to the creation and growth of intergenerational wealth, regardless of the demographic group to which the debtor belongs. Debt of any kind impedes the accumulation of wealth because you’re so preoccupied with paying someone else that you rarely get the opportunity to pay yourself first. Obviously, larger amounts of debt have a greater negative impact on the creation of wealth because it takes so much longer to pay it back. At the end of the day, debt is corrosive to the accumulation of wealth.

If you’re making payments on your student loan, your car loan, your credit cards, and your mortgage, then your money is not being put towards your family’s future. Whatever the size of the debt obligations, whether $500 per month or $5000 per month, the fact remains that you’ve committed to giving that amount of money to someone else in order to pay down your outstanding debt. You’ve agreed to give away the money that could have been used to build a foundation of wealth for yourself and your family.

Recently, I read an interview with a millionaire where a cycle of intergenerational wealth was put into place. The millionaire being interviewed was the daughter of parents who had worked very hard at regular jobs, while also running their own side hustles. Her parents had worked very hard to create wealth for their family. They taught their children the same principles, and the millionaire in turn taught those principles to her own two sons, the grandchildren. Over time, this family had created sufficient wealth that offspring who needed a mortgage did not have to go to the bank. Instead, mortgages were issued within the family from one generation to another. When the millionaires’s sons graduated from post-secondary schooling, each of them already had $200,000 in their investment portfolios. Their money had grown from cash gifts bestowed upon them by the grandparents. (Check out ESI Money if you want to read more millionaire interviews.)

Many parents want to pay for their children’s educations. This is a worthy goal and I have no quarrel with it. In today’s world, an education opens doors and provides opportunities that would otherwise not be available. An education is not a guarantee of success, but it is certainly an asset in the pursuit of success. Parents who save for their children’s educations are providing their children with a gift, i.e. starting their adult lives without student loans. They are gifting their children the opportunity to start with a clean slate. Once employed, their children will not be required to send a portion of their paycheques to the student loan people. Instead, if the children are wise, they will start using that portion of their money to invest for the future and to buy cash-flow positive assets…assuming, of course, that the children appreciate the opportunity provided by their parents’ gift of a debt-free post-secondary education.

The children who wisely take advantage of this opportunity are then in a position to do the same for the grandchildren, when they make their appearance. The children will have continued the tradition of ensuring that the next generation begins adulthood without debt. If the children were also fortunate enough to have invested in assets the grew over the years between their graduation and the start of the grandchildren’s post-secondary education, then those invested assets may still be available for the benefit of the grandchildren and the eventual great-grandchildren.

The cycle of passing down intergenerational wealth cannot flourish if the parents or the children are required to send part of their income to creditors, year in and year out. Creating intergenerational wealth begins with the basic principle of paying yourself first. The accumulation of wealth comes from the act of setting money aside from your paycheque and investing it for a positive return. If your money from today’s paycheque is being used to pay for yesterday’s purchases, then you’re impeding your ability to invest money for your future and for your family’s future. In other words, today’s paycheque cannot be used to pay for tomorrow’s needs and opportunities. Once you’ve given your money away to pay off debt, then your money is gone forever and you must find a way to earn more. Money spent on repaying debt can never be used to change your family’s future.

I am not an expert in parenting, but I have observed families in my life who have established a positive cycle of investing in businesses and assets while also saving money for their offspring’s future. These families are ensuring that the financial lessons are passed down so that each successive generation has the money to live a comfortable life and to both grow and preserve their wealth. One of the other things I’ve observed about these families is that they do not have debt.

I’ve watched as the parents gifted down payments for homes to the children. I’ve seen the parents assist the children to buy businesses. I’ve observed the children purchase income-producing rental property where their parents did not have intergenerational wealth to pass down. Where the parents didn’t have money, they had worked in real estate and had advice to give to their children about how to assess investment properties.  The children’s rental properties will become part of the intergenerational transfer of wealth to the grandchildren. Personally, my brother and I benefitted from such intergenerational transfers of wealth by having nearly all of our post-secondary education funded by our parents.

Please don’t get me wrong. Receiving a down payment didn’t eliminate the children’s obligation to pay the mortgage. However, the gift of a down payment meant that the children were able to start building equity in their homes sooner than their contemporaries who had to save up a down payment.

Even where the parents assisted a child to buy a business, there was still the need for a commercial business loan from the bank which had to be repaid. The parents’ transfer of wealth assisted the child to take advantage of the opportunity to buy a business that he understood intimately at a time in the child’s life when he did not have the money to buy the business himself. In that situation, the child received another form of intergenerational wealth – his parents worked at his business for free for the first couple of years until he got himself established enough to hire his own staff.

The children whose parents did not provide them with intergenerational transfers of wealth still took it upon themselves to start creating a strong financial foundation for their own future children. They purchased property, lived in it, and then rented it when they moved to the next home. Did they have to use mortgage debt? Yes, of course. Are they using the underlying asset to create positive cashflows in their lives? Yes, they are. The tenants pay the mortgage debt, and the cash flow from the properties is directed towards improving the families’ financial future.

I have also observed other families who seemed destined to live paycheque to paycheque. From what I can see, they make decisions with their money which will always require them to remain in debt servitude. From the outside, it looks like they actually love being in debt to someone. When a car breaks down, a brand-new car with a $700 per month payment is immediately purchased. There is no consideration given to the option of buying an adequate used car that fulfills the same purpose of safely going from point A to point B. Student loan debts are not aggressively paid down as soon as possible due to other priorities. Such loans last for ten or more years after the former student has graduated when sustained monetary effort could have eradicated the debt in three years or less. Mortgages are taken out when there is insufficient household income to handle the monthly payment, the utilities, the taxes and the other associated costs of running a home. Unfortunately, the mortgage-holders do not earn high incomes so they’ve essentially made themselves house-poor. They will be forced to live paycheque-to-paycheque until the mortgage debt is gone or until the bank forecloses on them for non-payment.

These families have purposely created situations for themselves where they are unable to create any wealth to pass on to the next generation. In fact, they cannot even create wealth for their own retirements. They purposely seek debt-burdens rather than debt-freedom, and I haven’t been able to figure out why. At the same time, these families want to live a life that they could actually afford if they didn’t have debt payments. They want the toys and the travel and the comforts that come with debt-free living yet they are not willing to do what needs to be done to rid themselves of debt.

Perhaps the distinction between the two families comes from the debt-free choosing a long-term view while the indebted choose a short-term view? I will continue to think about why some people get it and some people don’t, how some families are able to create a comfortable legacy while others are not. In the end, I guess the reason for the distinction doesn’t matter too, too much. The bottom line is that debt always inhibits the creation and the accumulation of intergenerational wealth. Debt prevents people from saving for their families’ future since it requires people to pay for their past purchases.

Just imagine what you could do for your family if you didn’t have to repay debt. How different would your life be? Is there something that you would be able to give to your children and your grandchildren that you can’t give them right now? How much could you change your family’s future if debt were not a part of your life?

Cash Flow Diagrams & Passive Income

I’m a visual leaner so when information can be presented in a picture, then I absorb it a lot faster. That’s why I was so damned impressed when I came across the following link on one of my travels through the Internet: Cash Flow Diagrams. In all honesty, this is one of the best links I have ever found!  In a few simple diagrams, Jacob Lund Fisker of Early Retirement Extreme succinctly illuminates the basic underlying principles behind the following concepts:

– paying yourself first;
– acquiring assets;
– creating passive income; and
– benefiting from compound interest.

 

Much ink has been spilled and many trees felled to write numerous books to explain these four foundational concepts. Mr. Fisker has accomplished the same goal with a few hand-drawn diagrams that are not overly complicated nor difficult to grasp. Please, please, please take the time to read Cash Flow Diagrams and figure out if your current cash flow is helping you to get to where you want to be or whether it’s holding you back from achieving your personal dreams.

 

The first diagram is a representation of the cash flow in the lives of those of you who live from paycheque to paycheque without going into debt. You are working hard for your money. When you get your money, you pay for your life and you have no money left over. You have to go back to work to make more money. This is called living at your means. In other words, your means are equal to your money and you spend all of your money between each paycheque. There is no room for investing because you spend every cent you make. This is not a good way to live! There is no breathing room – there is no cushion – there is nothing set aside for the day when you can no longer work. If you’re in this situation, I implore you to find a way to get out of it. Get a part-time job and use the money from that part-time job – or side hustle as it is now called – to get yourself into the position of being able to buy assets as displayed in diagram 3.

 

The second of Mr. Fisker’s diagrams applies to those of you who live from paycheque to paycheque and go into debt. You’re in an even worse situation than the people in the first diagram because you’re using credit to fund your life. Using credit means that you are going into debt. This is a very bad cash flow situation because it means that your money is not enough to pay for your life so you’re relying on credit to make ends meet. You are living above your means, and this is a very bad state of affairs.  The reason why it is so undesirable is that you’re paying interest on the credit that you’ve borrowed. If your paycheque is not enough money to pay for your life already, then it’s an absolute certainty that your money is not enough to cover both your life and the interest owing on your debt. (Again, as soon as you use credit it become a debt!) If you’re in this situation, I would suggest that you do whatever you can to get out of it sooner rather than later. Compounding interest is working against you and keeping you from achieving what you really want from life!

 

If you have disposable income after buying whatever stuff you need to keep body and soul together, also known as: the necessities, then your cash flow is reflected in the third diagram. Disposable income is just a fancy way of saying leftover money. If you, my friend, are fortunate enough to have leftover money, then you are in the enviable position of being able to acquire some assets.

 

What’s an asset? An asset is anything that puts money in your pocket by producing an income payable to you. If you are living below your means, then you have leftover money for investing. And when that leftover money is put to good use through purchasing assets, you are well on your way to creating a stream of passive income. This is a very good thing! Ideally, everyone can get themselves to this point, namely having some amount of passive income even though, at first, that passive income isn’t enough to fund your entire life. Passive income will grow if it is diligently reinvested and left to compound over time. You still have to work, but that’s okay because working means that you’re generating more money to buy more assets that will increase your passive income. Eventually, your passive income will exceed the size of your paycheque. The faster you acquire income-producing assets, the faster your passive income will increase.

 

Once you make it to the fourth diagram, you’re laughing. At this point, the reality of your cash flow is that your assets are throwing off enough passive income to pay for your stuff. In other words, you are not required to work. You don’t have to quit your job if you don’t want to – it’s just that working for a salary is now completely optional. This is a wonderful achievement! You can do what you want with your time because your passive income has replaced your wage as the source of money to fund your life. If you’ve reached this stage, then my hat is off to you – congratulations!

 

The fifth diagram represents retirement. As in the fourth diagram, the cash flow from your assets is sufficient to fund your life and you’ve simply chosen not to work for wages anymore. At this stage, your passive income has replaced your paycheque. Hooray!

 

When I found this article online, I was already living the life depicted in the third diagram. Thankfully, I had no debt and my take-home pay was enough to pay for my living expenses – there was money leftover every payday. My student loans were gone. My mortgage was paid off. I no longer had a car loan.  At that point in my life, I knew that I had to absolutely, positively invest my money after maxing out my registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) and my tax free savings account (TFSA), but I didn’t know where or how or what to do. I didn’t trust financial advisors, so I decided to buy units in dividend-paying mutual funds. (At the time, I didn’t know that mutual funds were vastly more expensive than index funds or exchange-traded funds [ETFs] – now that I know better, I do better!)

 

I set up an automatic bi-weekly transfer of money from my chequing account to my investment account so that I could invest monthly and take advantage of the benefits of dollar-cost averaging. Automating my savings meant that I didn’t have to decide whether to set aside my leftover money. Relying on automation to fund my investment account was an exceptionally smart move on my part because I’m sure that I would’ve been tempted to buy something other than investments if I had to think about saving vs. spending every time I got paid.

 

Did I pick the perfect investment? I doubt it. I’m not that lucky nor am I that smart. Also, my accumulating years have taught me that there is no one perfect investment. I invested in a product that I understood – dividend funds – and set up a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) so that my dividend payments were automatically reinvested. I had no idea whether this plan would work perfectly. All I knew at the time was that dividends were a form of passive income. I knew I didn’t have the skills or inclination to read company reports and to follow the stock market. I knew that I wanted an investment portfolio that would supplement my other retirement income when I decided to leave work. Dividend mutual funds – and, later, dividend ETFs – satisfied my list of what I wanted for my portfolio so I picked one and started investing.

 

Dividend payments are my preferred form of passive income so I invest my money in dividend-producing assets. As a Singleton, I don’t have the benefits that come with having another person’s income contributing to my household. Having a reliable stream of dividend income soothes some of the risk of living in a single-income household. My goal is for my passive income to cover my monthly necessities. Once I’ve met that goal, then I’ll know that I can survive on my own even if my salary goes away.

 

As a result of my choices to automate my money and to invest it regularly, I’m now in the position of comfortably earning four figures of dividend income every month. My passive income stream is not yet enough for me to live on, so I still have several years of working in my future. However, my passive income is compounding every single month as it’s added to the new investment purchases that I make with the money that is automatically transferred to my investment account when I get paid. I’m comfortably investing the equivalent of one paycheque every month. I like to think of my dividend income as my side hustle income, even though I don’t have to do anything other than breathe to earn the dividends.

 

Where are you now? And where do you want to be in five, ten, twenty years?  How much passive income do you want in order to live the life of your dreams? What steps are you taking to put yourself in the cash flow position that you want for your future?