Retirement - Millionaire on the Prairie

Money Habits Ought Not to Be Underestimated

When I first delved into the world of personal finance, I came across the idea that savers have trouble spending their money. Basically, the belief is that those who have saved all their lives are incapable of reversing their behaviour and spending their savings once they retire. I pooh-poohed that point-of-view. After all, how could being fiscally prudent be a bad thing? Or result in a bad outcome?

I promptly dismissed a perspective that I considered nonsense and happily continued along my own path of saving and investing. Save some, spend some seemed to be a far more intelligent way to use money IMHO. I worked my way up to saving a third of my paycheque for retirement. The rest of my take-home pay was spent on travel, concerts, home renovations, the daily Care-&-Feeding-of-Blue-Lobster, gifts for & celebrations with family & friends, and various other things. Surely I had it all figured out in my 30s didn’t I? Why should I even considered another way of seeing things when it came to how to spend money?

As they say, with age comes wisdom. It’s been many years since I discarded the notion that I would have trouble spending money when the time comes. Lately, I’ve been reviewing my own beliefs and taking another look at my own money habits. For more than 20 years, my method has been to rely on automatic transfers to fund my investment account. Rightly or wrongly, I picked out several mutuals funds then moved on to exchange-traded funds and invested my money into those investment products every single month.*** Every dividend earned has been re-invested through a dividend re-investment plan (DRIP). When I received raises, my contribution amount was increased too. A portion of each raise was invested for the future and the rest went into increasing my day-to-day comfort.

I’d thought I was doing most things right. Earn – invest – spend the rest. Looking back, I know that I didn’t pick the perfect investment products for my goals. (I’d been investing in dividend ETFs instead of equity ETFs. That “little mistake” was corrected in October of 2020.) With the benefit of hindsight, I see that I could have made better choices earlier in my investment journey but c’est la vie!

Today, I’m quickly approaching my anticipated retirement date. I’m quite happy about getting 100% of my time back. My work is mentally challenging and my colleagues are fantastic. I’ve been very fortunate in many aspects of my career. In spite of all of that, working at my current job until I take my last breath has never been a goal that’s made it onto my Bucket List. I’m very much looking forward to retirement. However…

I must confess that I’m feeling much more than slight trepidation about the idea of spending my money. The paycheques will stop and I will have to turn to other cash flows in order to continue paying for my life. And after a lifetime of money habits to save-save-save, it’s going to be a challenge to spend instead. My youthful self’s pooh-poohing is coming back to bite me in the butt.

Two years ago, I finally attended a meeting with a fee-only financial advisor. He told me that I was doing very well, and that I would have plenty for my retirement. He even told me that I could retire 2 years earlier than I’d planned! My financial advisor set up a withdrawal system for me… and that’s when it hit me. I would have to spend my money. Not all of it, and not all at once, of course – but I would have to spend some of it every year until my death.

Truthfully, the realization left me more than a little shaken.

Since then, I’ve also started listening to Ramit Sethi and his view on how to create a rich life. According to Mr. Sethi, who I do admire, I am not living a rich life because I haven’t yet defined what that would look like for me. In his estimation, I’m not using my money in the best way possible. While I’ve never been dissatisfied with my money choices, it would appear that I might not have been asking myself the right questions.

In addition to Ramit Sethi, I’ve started following Bridget Casey. She is another proponent of living a rich life. Now, she’s a few years younger than me so her life circumstances are very different than mine. However, she’s asking herself the questions now that I should have been asking myself when I was her age. Ms. Casey is also a fan of Ramit Sethi, so she’s building her rich life today. There’s a small part of me that wishes I had learned about this concept earlier.

So the question is the following: do I regret my money habits?

I wish I had a simple answer to that question. My money habits are going to allow me to retire 2 years earlier than planned. I will never regret that! At the same time, my money habits – particularly the one about never borrowing money to travel – prevented me from attending a wedding in Paris. I had just gotten home from Italy (or Spain?) when I received the invite to head back to Europe in a few months for a cousin’s wedding. My sinking fund for travel was empty and I didn’t have the funds to pay for the wedding trip in cash. So I declined the invitation. Do I regret that decision? Yes, but only a little bit.

Abiding by my money habits for so long has crippled my ability to make most decisions without considering the financial implications. Now, one of the biggest financial goals of my life is going to force me to amend my money habits. Firstly, I don’t need to save and invest anymore. I’m still not certain that I will stop completely or that I’ll ever feel comfortable turning off my DRIP. (My financial advisor said I should stop the DRIP when I retire.) Life without an automatic transfer into my savings/investing account is unimaginable to me, although I’m well aware that the vast majority of people do not save and invest regularly. That’s their choice and their choices aren’t my business, but if I’m not doing it – saving and investing – for myself then I start to feel rather anxious.

I’m very glad that I’m learning this about myself today, instead of after I retire. There’s time for me to start making some changes. One of those changes has been to decrease the amount of money that goes into my various sinking funds. I’ve redirected a few hundred dollars towards another goal, but I still need to get some advice from my accountant. Once I’ve spoken to her, then those few hundred dollars will probably go towards little day-to-day luxuries like a 4-6 hot-stone massages every year and a monthly housekeeper. My “rich life” might not be as grand as those of Mr. Sethi and Ms. Casey but that’s okay. Their priorities aren’t mine.

So I take it from me. Money habits should not be underestimated. Once you’re in a particular groove with your money, it’s going to be challenging to change them. While I’m still a fierce proponent of saving and investing, I’m going focus the next few years on figuring out how to spend my money too. I want my spending to bring me just as much comfort, joy and happiness in the next phase of my life as my saving-and-investing has brought me up to now. There’s a way to ensure I’m living my own rich life in retirement and I’m determined to find it.

*** There was an unfortunate 4-month hiatus during the most severe period in the 2008 recession. I could’ve been buying equities when the stock market was at its lowest, but I got scared and stopped my contributions. Trust me – I have since learned my lesson. We’re in another stock market downturn right now (2022) and I’m turning over the seat cushions to find money to invest in the stock market before this recession is declared over.

Can You Save Too Much Money?

This question recently came up, and I’ve been noodling on it ever since. My whole adult life, I’ve been following the habit of maxing out my RRSP, my TFSA, and saving another chunk of my paycheque in my non-registered investment account. However, yesterday, someone asked me what I was saving it all for and whether I would still be able to achieve my retirement goals if I saved slightly less and spent more money in my day-to-day.

Mind blown!

In all honesty, I have never seriously considered that possibility. When it comes to my own money, I’m very rigid and allow for little, if any, deviation from my money rules. I wanted to hit certain savings targets in my life, and I’m pleased to say that I’ve hit them. It simply never occurred to me that doing so would mean that I would be saving too much money.

Bridget Casey, Ramit Sethi, and Bill Perkins are three people whom I’ve started following online in the past few years. Each of them, in their own way, discusses the importance of operating from an abundance mindset instead of a scarcity mindset. All of them encourage their readers/followers to live a rich life today and to avoid putting off today’s happiness to save for tomorrow’s.

It was brought to my attention that, though I read those books, there’s a very, very, very teensy-weensy, itty-bitty, little chance that I might not be putting their advice into practice. It’s quite possible that I’m operating from a scarcity mindset. Maybe I’m operating out of a place of fear that I won’t have enough, despite all the evidence to the contrary? A very wise and very good friend has suggested to me that I’m in a position where I have enough invested for the future. (Truth be told, I’ve heard that same message or a variation thereof from other people who love me.) The suggestion was made that continuing to save for tomorrow will prevent me from having what I want today. My friend’s words threw me for a loop and I’ve been thinking about them ever since she uttered them.

So again, my question is can you save too much money?

This question leads me to more questions. According to calculations I trust, I will die with several million dollars in the bank if I stick to my current Rigid Rules. I’m a Single. No spouse, no kids. Strictly speaking, I have no natural heirs of my own issue. Does it make sense for me to die with that much money when I don’t have my own children? Isn’t there the slightest possibility that I could cut back on my saving right now and let my current investments ride? After all, I would still die with a nice fat cash-cushion, but I could have a little more fun along the way if I spent more of my money day-to-day.

Yet that viewpoint leads me to the next question that I think is important. Am I unhappy with how I currently spend my money?

My honest answer is that I’m not. In all honesty, when I want something, I buy it. Do I save for it first? Generally, yes – saving comes before spending. Do I stop or reduce my investment and retirement contributions to spend money? No, never. Is this a bad choice?

Until yesterday, I would have emphatically said “No – it’s not a bad choice.”

Today, I’m not so sure. If my retirement will still be quite comfortable, even if I spend a little bit more today, then does it make sense to continue with the same savings habit? Alternatively, should I be forcing myself to spend more money today just because I can?

The goal of life isn’t to simply die with a whole lot of money. Even I can appreciate that such a life is a wasted one. I don’t feel that I’m wasting my life by following my Rigid Rules. Right now, I go out with my friends. I travelled a lot before the pandemic. I spend a lot of time with my family. Buying what I want, when I want isn’t an issue. Could I spend more money on stuff for the sake of doing so? Sure, but I don’t want to fill my house with stuff that I don’t need or won’t use.

My whole life, I’ve been a money planner. I’ve been saving since I was a small child. My parents started us on an allowance. When I started working, I kept up the habit. Never once did I question whether I was doing the right thing by saving something from every paycheque. As my paycheques grew, so did the percentage that I saved and invested. Lifestyle inflation was never a problem for me. Living below my means has always be my guiding financial principle. I created a very large buffer between myself and the financial edge.

Now, I’m entering the second half of my life. The lessons that got me here might not be exactly the right ones to get me where I really want to be. It’s time for me to consider the possibility that I’ve moved into the “and” stage of my life. Up until now, I’ve always believed that I have to choose between various options. However, it’s starting to come to my attention that maybe there are situations where I don’t have to choose. Maybe I’ve reached a point where I can have both.

I can spend money today and still retire comfortably. It might be time for me to force myself to spend, in just the same way that I forced myself to save. Maybe I can cut my daily saving amount and still reach my financial goals. I get one life, and I want it to be as good as I can possibly make it. This means that I need to get back to assessing if what I’m still doing will continue to be the right choice. The strategies that I employed when I was younger may not be the strategies that will benefit me going forward.

Can you save too much money? The question will stick with me for a good while. I’m happy with how I live my life, but I have to consider the possibility that I could be happier. There’s a chance that I could be spending my money in a way that brings me more joy today while still ensuring that I’ll be taken care of tomorrow. And that’s the goal that I should be striving to fulfill.

You Should Always Be Saving Money!

There is no way around it. You should always be saving money – some way, some how. Life is expensive, and it only gets more so. Name one essential thing in your life that has gotten cheaper over the years. Food? Nope. Rent or housing costs? No! Gasoline? Not a chance. Utilities? Not a bit. Transit? Slower increases but increases all the same.

Even if you have a fixed mortgage on your home, the cost of borrowing money will go up when you renew. The central banks are on a tear because they want to get inflation under control. That means mortgages are more expensive. Even with a fixed mortgage, the other costs of home ownership have gone up over the years.

While it’s important to live in the present, I would argue that you owe it to yourself to resist the incessant urging of the AdMan and his trusty sidekick, the Creditor, to always be buying. You need to save money for Tomorrow, and there’s a good chance that you don’t know exactly how much you’ll need.

For example, if you own a house, then you should definitely be saving. At some point, your house will need an expensive repair or costly maintenance. It could be a new furnace, a new hot water heater, new windows, new roof, or a new foundation. It’s unlikely you’ll be able to buy another of those things for less than $100. And while a new hot water heater doesn’t cost nearly as much as a new roof, it’s best that you have the cash-money on hand to buy it outright. Your water heater should not be the reason you’re paying interest on your credit card.

And while a new roof is likely going to run you 5-figures, the same principle applies. Start saving money now so that you have the cash in place in 10-15-20 years when you’ll need to replace your roof. Much like successfully saving for retirement, owning a home requires long-term financial planning. I love my home but I’m the first to tell everyone that it’s a money pit.

Saving for retirement should be obvious. Your bills won’t disappear until you die. In other words, you may have parted ways with your employer but don’t assume that means that your bills will have parted ways with you. Whether 25, 45, 65 or 85, you’ll still need to eat and have shelter. Society still demands that you be clothed. No matter how old you become, you will need money for the basics.

You need to invest today so that Tomorrow You will be okay financially. Remember that most people don’t have pensions, i.e. their employers are not saving for them. It’s up to you to save and invest. For those few who do have pensions, there’s a chance that your pension is not indexed to inflation. This means that your employer will pay you a fixed amount when you retire, but that amount will never go up since it is not indexed to inflation. Prices will continue to increase but your pension amount will be set in stone until you die. This is not a good situation to be in if your retirement is going to last a long time. And since very few us know our expiry date in advance, it’s best that you start investing your money ASAP and ensure that your portfolio mix is built for growth.

Maybe you own your vehicle. You should definitely be saving. Oil changes, brakes, tune-ups, various repairs, insurance, registration – all of these things cost money. Ideally, you’ll pay cash for your car. And if you can’t pay cash, then pick the least expensive vehicle you can find that will do the job so that your financing costs are as low as possible. Once your loan is done, continue to pay that loan amount into your Next Car Fund. When the wheels fall off your current vehicle, hopefully you will have enough in your Next Car Fund to pay cash. Then repeat the cycle. This method works best if you can get 5 years or more between vehicle purchases.

Do you have loved ones with whom you like to celebrate things? Are they the people you call when you want to do things? Concerts? Sports games? Picnics? Wine tastings? Movies? If the answer is yes, then you should have some fun-money set aside for those times together. It doesn’t have to be a lot, but every paycheque should see $40-$50 going towards these outings. Life is better when it’s shared with those we love. And while there are free things that you can share with loved ones, there are also times when you might want to spend a little bit of money on them too.

One of the very best benefits of always saving your money is that you can live in a state of debt freedom. Your entire paycheque, after taxes, is completely yours. You need not send any of your hard-earned money to a creditor for a purchase made in the past. You get to keep your money! This is an exceptionally good thing considering how hard you’ve worked for it.

So just remember to always be saving. Whatever it is that you want, try to save for it in advance then pay cash. You won’t ever regret depriving your creditors of interest payments. Trust me on this one!

Is it Better to Invest or Pay Off Debt?

One of the perennial questions in the sphere of personal finance is whether it is better to invest or pay off debt. The answer is nuanced and there is no one right answer for anyone.

Money has to be invested in the stock market for as long as possible. Time is required so that capital gains and dividends can be accrued and re-invested on a consistent, long-term basis. In other words, compound growth works best when given a long time horizon. These facts favour paying the absolute minimum on your debts while investing money into the market.

On the other hand, paying debt for longer than necessary means that you’re sending interest payments to creditors. Consumer debt can have double-digit interest rates. Unless you’re paying 0% interest on your debt, you can be guaranteed that you’re paying interest to someone for the privilege of having borrowed their money. Debts have a way sticking around much longer than we’d like. From that perspective, it makes sense to pay off debt as fast as possible and to delay investing.

Both good options. Which one is best?

This is where nuance must be applied. Each person’s situations is different. Yet, the following remains true. Dollars spent to repay money owed to creditors cannot be invested in the stock market for long-term growth. If you devote 5 years to pay off non-mortgage debt, aka: consumer debt, then that means you’ve lost 5 years of compound growth for your investment portfolio. It might take longer than 5 years to eradicate your debts. The bottom line is that your money needs to be invested today, preferably yesterday, so that it can grow as quickly as possible.

Why not do both simultaneously?

As I’ve matured and gained wisdom, I’ve started to ask myself why the choice has to be so stark. Is there a really good reason why a person cannot do both? Why not invest and pay down debt at the same time?

Presumably, you are not living paycheque-to-paycheque. This means that there’s some extra money in your budget. If there wasn’t, then this question wouldn’t even come up in the first place. The reason you’re asking the question is because you want to make best use that extra money.

Let’s say you have an extra $250 per month. Why not send half to your investment portfolio and send the other half to your debts? I call this the Half-and-Half Method.

If you invest on no-commission platform, then you’ll be investing $125 each month for the Care and Feeding of Future You. This is a respectable start. (As you earn more money and pay off your debt, this amount should be increased.)

The other $125 can be put towards your debt as an extra payment. Some people apply extra money to the lowest balance, in order to get rid of it faster – the Debt Snowball Method. Other people choose to direct extra money to the debt with the highest interest rate, in order to pay as little interest as possible – the Debt Avalanche Method. Personally, I like the snowball method because it delivers a sense of accomplishment sooner rather than later.

Remember that nuance I was mentioning earlier? Well, there are two factors that I look at in any situations. There are probably more, but I’ve yet to ponder them sufficiently to discuss them with you in this post.

Age

The younger you are, the longer the time horizon. For this reason, I think you can devote slightly more to your debt repayment than your investments. If you’re under 30, then I’m okay if 60% of your $250 goes to debt repayment while 35% goes to investments.

Every compound growth chart out there shows that younger people can invest much less money each month to achieve the same final amount as someone who starts investing at later ages.

That said, I don’t want you to think that investing $0 is acceptable. It is not. You should be aiming for atleast $100 per month when you’re in your 20s. Again, as you pay off debt and/or increase your income, you’ll need to increase this amount.

If you’re 30 and older, definitely use the Half-and-Half method. You don’t want debt payments in retirement, especially if you’ll be living on a fixed income. However, you’ll also want to build a nice cash cushion for your retirement. The Half-and-Half method allows you to do both.

Length of Time To Pay Off Debt

This one appears to contradict my Half-and-Half method. Still, I do like the sense of accomplishment that it provides. If you can knock out a debt in 90 days or less, then commit the entire $250 to doing so and forego contributing to your investments for 3 months.

The caveat here is that this is a one-time option. I don’t want you to delay investing for 90 days, then delay investing for another 90 days to knock out another debt, and then delay investing again. Serially focusing on paying off one debt at a time is simply focusing on paying off debt. If you pay off a 90-day debt only to incur another debt that can be paid off in 90 days, then you’re better off using the Half-and-Half method. Clearly, debt is going to be a structural feature of your life so you need to be investing atleast some of your money for the Care and Feeding of Future You.

Too Long, Didn’t Read!

Is it better to invest or pay off debt?

The answer is to do both at the same time. The need to provide for Future You does not diminish just because you’re paying off debt. Contribute to your investment portfolio while you’re paying off your debts. Eventually, your debts will go away and there will be a nice cash cushion waiting for you later on down the line. It’s the best of both worlds.

My 5 Most Successful Steps to Retiring As I Wish

Ever since I started working, I’ve been thinking about the day that I can stop – for good. Thankfully, I’ve had very good jobs and worked with amazing people. My work has been challenging and my tasks have been interesting. All that said, work is not my passion in life. I’m not one of those people who bounds out of bed every morning because I’m excited to get to the office. Nope. I’m willing to admit that I’m happier with life when I’m not at work. Whether it’s two weeks away on my annual vacation, two days away on a weekend, or a day off during the week for whatever reason. I’m always happier with my life when I’m not at work.

Thankfully, I learned this truth about myself when I was quite young. As a result, I started my retirement planning when I was 21 years old. Here are the most successful steps that I’ve taken over the years to maximize the odds that I can retire as I wish.

Contributing the Maximum to my RRSP

In hindsight, maybe it wasn’t the best decision to start investing in my Registered Retirement Savings Plan at age 21. I still remember my parents’ accountant telling me that taking the tax deduction while I was a student wasn’t the best idea. He didn’t have any qualms with me contributing to my RRSP but he thought I should wait to claim the deduction in the future when I’d graduated and was working in my chosen profession.

Looking back, I can see that his advice was very good. Admittedly, I didn’t really understand it. My lifelong love of learning about all things personal finance was nascent so I didn’t appreciate the wisdom of his words. At 21, I happily claimed the deduction and spent it on some item whose memory thereof has been lost to the mists of time.

Stupid decision or not, the RRSP-habit was formed. I have contributed the maximum allowable amount to my RRSP every single year since age 21. The money first went into GICs, then into mutual funds, and finally it is now all invested in exchange traded funds. As I learned better, I did better. Over the years, my MERs have dropped and my returns have skyrocketed.

Contributing the Maximum to my TFSA

In 2009, the federal government introduced the Tax Free Savings Account. I can still recall sitting at my computer desk and hearing the words come out of the Minister of Finance’s mouth as I listened to the recap of the federal budget. My head whipped around and I immediately started paying attention. What had he just said? There was going to be a new way for me to save money without paying taxes? Tell me more!

My wise younger sibling then said the following to me:

“Blue Lobster, for you, the TFSA is just another retirement savings vehicle.”

Lightbulb on!

Ever since it’s been available, I have been making the maximum contributions to my TFSA. These contributions have never been sullied by interest rates incapable of matching inflation, as are offered by GICs, nor have they been brutalized by the higher-than-necessary MERs of mutual funds. Nope. I immediately put my TFSA money to work in dividend-paying ETFs.

After another discussion with my accountant, I decided that my TFSA could be used to create a tax-free stream of income in retirement. If I invested in dividend-paying ETFs, then I could withdraw the monthly dividends from my TFSA in retirement. It would be tax-free cash flow. Cha-ching! There was also the tiny little benefit that money from my TFSA wouldn’t impinge my ability to get OAS payments.

Was this the smartest use of my investment? Probably not. I now listen to the wisdom of Bridget Casey of Money After Graduation, and she’s convinced me that I should’ve gone for growth by investing in different equity ETFs. She’s probably right. There was a bull run in the stock market from 2009 to 2020. My TFSA would be bigger had I made different investment choices.

Contributing a Good-Sized Chunk of my Paycheque to my Brokerage Account

This is where the rubber really hits the road. Once I’d paid off my mortgage, I had a good bit of money remaining in my bank account every two weeks. (For the record, I’m a big believer in accelerated bi-weekly mortgage payments.)

Instead of spending that money on this-and-that, I put it to work in my non-registered investment account at my brokerage. My former mortgage payments went straight into ETFs. As with my RRSP & TFSA investments, I put everything on the dividend re-investment plan. When I got raises, I diverted some of the newly-earned money to my investment portfolio and some of it went to increasing my standard of living. As time passed, I was able to get to the point where I’m investing 1/3 of my net pay into my brokerage account and living on the rest.

Staying Away from Debt

In today’s world, it is very hard to avoid all debt. I understand that. I don’t like it, but I understand it.

For my part, I’ve had student loans, vehicle loans and a mortgage. Thankfully, I’ve never had revolving credit card debt. In the interests of transparency, I’ll admit that I do use my credit card but I pay the balance in full every single month.

However, I don’t have debt. The last time I bought a vehicle was in 2008. I used my line of credit and I did everything possible to pay off that LOC-debt within 6 months. It sucked but I didn’t care. I knew that having a car loan for 5 years would’ve sucked too. In my mind, 6 months of short-term sacrifice was well-worth the extra 4.5 years of car-loan freedom. And, yes – my former car loan payments were re-directed to my investments once that debt was gone.

My house has been paid off for 15+ years. While the property taxes, utilities and insurance aren’t cheap, my housing costs are far less than they’d be if I still had a mortgage to pay on top of everything else.

Life without debt is generally better. Instead of money going to your creditors, it can be re-directed to paying for your life’s dreams. It’s best avoided altogether. And if you can’t avoid debt, then minimize it to the greatest extent possible. While it’s in your life, do whatever you can to get rid of it as soon as possible.

Playing the Lottery

Bet you weren’t expecting that one, were you?

It’s true. I play the lottery every week – to the tune of about $20/wk. Even though it hasn’t yet paid off, I consider this one of my most successful steps.

I’ve heard that the lottery is a tax on the stupid, and that those who can’t do math are the ones who play the lottery. I don’t care. The fact of the matter is that I can’t win if I don’t play. Someone has to win and it might as well be me.

Let’s face facts. I’m contributing the max to my RRSP and my TFSA. One third of my paycheque is going into my investment portfolio. I don’t have any debt. Spending $1040 per year on lottery tickets is not going to make or break me. My retirement plans are still on track. If I win the lottery, they’ll just get a fantastically, awesome boost and I can retirement today instead of tomorrow.

Playing the lottery is my indulgence and I’m not giving it up. Other people will spend their disposable income as they wish. I will too. No judgment.

Final Thoughts on Why I Save So Much

I’ve been working in my current position for a long time now. Believe me when I say that my feelings towards working haven’t changed. I’m still happier when I’m not at the office. And I say this despite the fact that I have mentally challenging work. I’m rarely ever bored by my work. My colleagues are truly wonderful people who carry their weight and are always there for me when I need guidance, advice, or mentorship. My bosses are all fairly good people. And while I would never turn my nose up at a raise, the truth is that my compensation allows me to live the life I want. Even my benefits are not too shabby. All in all, I have a working situation that many others can only dream of yet I’m still far happier when I’m at home or with family or on vacation.

I have no illusions that my feelings are unique or that others prefer working to spending time doing what they love with those whom they love. The difference between me and them is that I’ve created a financial foundation for myself where work is becoming optional. This blog post is about the most successful steps I’ve relied on during my working life. Thanks to them, I’ve put myself in a position where I don’t have to allow my paycheque to be the overriding factor in decisions about my life. If my paycheque were to disappear, I wouldn’t have to find another one immediately… or at all. I have the comfort of knowing that my investments – and hopefully a newspaper-worthy lottery win! – will replace my paycheque when I’m ready to part ways with my employer.

Commission Free Investing is Fantastic!

Allow me to be very transparent, right from the start. I’ve had a non-registered investment account with BMO Investorline for decades. They’ve recently introduced a list of exchange-traded funds that can be purchased for free. Let me tell you say it again. Commission-free investing is fantastic!

I suspect that this move to providing commission-free purchases is in response to newcomers such as Questrade and WealthSimple. I don’t have an account with Questrade or WealthSimple, but it’s my understanding that their platforms both allow investors to buy ETFs for free.

This is wonderful. Commissions on investments through brokerages can run from $4.95 to $9.95. If you don’t have to pay them, then you can invest your former commission fee. Remember! The sooner you invest your money, the sooner it can start compounding for you. One of your goals during your accumulation phase is to invest your money as soon as you can. Investing without commissions allows you to do that.

For my part, I buy units in my preferred ETFs every month. Luckily, my paycheque is bi-weekly. That means, money shows up in my account every 2 weeks. I siphon off a chunk for investing. Every other paycheque, or every 4 weeks, I take my investment-money and buy more units in my preferred ETF. At the same time, my ETFs pay me dividends every month. While all of my ETFs are on the dividend re-investment plan (DRIP), there’s usually a little bit of dividend money left over after I’ve received my new DRIP-units.

For example, my ETF might pay me $100 in dividends. If my ETF is trading at $15/unit, then I only receive 6 DRIP-units valued at $90 (=$15 x 6). That leave $10 in dividends sitting in my account. Four weeks later, the same thing happens. I receive another $100 in dividends and my ETF is still trading at $15/unit. Again, my DRIP feature kicks into action and buys me 6 more units, leaving another $10 worth of dividends in my account. (For the ease of calculation, assume that my ETF’s trading price stays the same. In real life, the price of my ETFs fluctuates from month to month.)

Wait a minute – hold the phone! Now, I have $20 in “leftover” dividends. Yet the cost of each unit is still only $15. Since there’s no commission to buy, I simply do a trade for 1 unit at $15. There’s still $5 leftover in my account, since $20-$15=$5, but who cares? I’ve done all that I can to get as much of my money working for me as soon as possible.

This is why commission-free investing is fantastic! More of my money can be invested sooner. The more units I have, the more dividends I earn the following month. This is self-reinforcing cycle that increases my passive cashflow, via DRIP-units and commission-free units. As I’ve said before, passive cashflow is awesome. You work once – you invest money earned from your blood, sweat and tears – that investment pays you dividends. So long as you don’t spend them, those dividends earn you more dividends as they compound over time. What’s not to love about this process? Now that you know about it, you can create the same system for yourself.

Earn it once, invest it until retirement. Dividend ETfs have been the bedrock of my investment portfolio for the past 10+ years. Happily, I can report that my dividends hit the 5-figure mark years ago. At this point, I expect that they will be a very nice supplement to my other retirement income when my employer and I part ways. Up until a few years ago, commission fees constrained how often I reinvested my “leftover” dividends. Today, those fees no longer a concern. Whenever I have enough money in my account to buy a unit in one of my ETFs, I’m investing it immediately. The sooner my money’s invested, the sooner it can start to compound and to increase my passive cashflow.

Ever since commission-free investing has been available, I have done my best to take advantage of it. You should take advantage of it too!

Pension or Not, Feather Your Own Nest!

It’s up to you to feather your own nest, regardless of whether you have a pension. The first step is to take responsibility for Future You by investing some of today’s money for tomorrow. It is both risky and foolish to rely on your employer for your retirement income needs. You shouldn’t assume that your employer’s contributions to your retirement plan are going to be sufficient when you can no longer work for a living.

Simply put, a pension is a promise from your employer that there will be money for Future You when you quit working for that employer. While you’re employed, your boss sets aside money for your retirement. That money goes into the pension. It is then distributed to the former employees each month.

Under a defined-benefit pension, the employer contributes money to the plan and promises to pay you a fixed monthly amount when you retire. This is your pension payment, and it is calculated by a formula. The payment is derived from your years of service and your salary. In other words, you can figure out how much you’ll receive in advance of retirement. The longer you work, the higher your salary, the bigger your pension will be. Your employer takes responsibility for ensuring that there will be enough money to pay you a pension until the day you die. Your benefit is defined.

The defined-contribution pension works differently. Your employer promises to contribute to your pension plan. There are no promises about how much you’ll receive when you retire. Under this plan, it is the employer’s monetary contribution that is defined. Your employer takes no responsibility for ensuring what your pension payment will be when you retire. Determining the size of your pension payment is a responsibility that lies on your shoulders. You’re the one who has to ensure that the money is properly invested for the long-term. Your choices will determine if your pension payment will be big enough to pay your bills once you’ve stopped working. Under this pension, two employees working the same length of time for the same salary can receive vastly different pension payments when they retire. The difference is attributable to how each employee chose to invest their pension contributions.

Hedge your bets when it comes to funding your retirement.

No matter what kind of pension you have, you need to feather your own nest. Why? Simple – a pension is a promise, not a guarantee. If your employer goes out of business, your pension will be impacted. It may take years for you to receive the pension payments that you were promised. Just talk to some former retirees from Nortel or Sears Canada. They all saw their pension payments cut when their employers went bankrupt. What would you do if 30% of your paycheque disappeared today? Now imagine losing 30% of your pension payment when you’re too old to return to the workforce. What options would you have for replacing that chunk of your promised pension?

Having your own investment portfolio is like having insurance for your pension. Investing for the long term increases your chances of being able to live off the income from your portfolio. If things go in your favour, dividends and capital gains might eventually exceed your annual pension income. Every dollar earned by your investments is one that can replace a dollar from your pension just in case the worst happens to your pension. Think about it. The Nortel and Sears Canada employees with personal investment portfolios weren’t as badly impacted when their pension payments were cut. The income from their investments was available to replace the money cut from their pension cheques. Had they planned on spending the cashflow from their investments? Maybe, maybe not. The reality is that having that investment cashflow dulled the impact of the reduced pension.

Do Better for Future You

I know how seductive the pension promise is. It would be lovely to cast aside all responsibility for Future You’s financial health, to let “someone else” worry about that. It’s the path of least resistance, but it might be disastrous. You wouldn’t even know how disastrous until it was too late. Imagine working for decades then realizing that you won’t have enough money. You’ll be out of time to earn more money. At 70 years old, do you really believe that you’ll eagerly anticipate working another 10, 15, 20 years just to make ends meet?

And I recognize how persuasive the AdMan is! In a world where you’re constantly exhorted to live your best life, it’s hard to save for a future that is decades away. After all, living your best life is generally code for open-your-wallet-and-give-me-your-money. The AdMan won’t be there to pay your bills in your dotage. Trust me on that!

Again, a pension is only a promise. This is why you have to feather your own nest! Err on the side of caution and invest some of your own money for Future You. No one is suggesting that you become a miser. I don’t want you to give up all the things that you love in order to save for tomorrow. I recognize that no one is promised tomorrow. However, I do want you to admit that there’s little to no harm in investing a portion of today’s money for tomorrow’s needs. Having a pension and cashflow from your personal investment portfolio would be the best of both worlds. Why deprive yourself of that?

Start Today

The reality is that you have to worry about Future You. Living below your means isn’t a punishment. It’s an admirable way of governing your financial life. Doing so will maximize your comfort when you no longer can, or want, to work. Money invested for the long-term will generate annual income for you, regardless of the pension plan you’re in.

Shave a little something off of each paycheque and invest it for tomorrow. I would advise saving 25% of your net income, but you know your finances better than I do. If you can only start with $10, then start with $10. Every penny counts, but you have to start somewhere. As your income grows, as your debts are eliminated, increase the amount that you’re investing. Once you’ve saved a portion of your paycheque for the Care and Feeding of Future You, then spend whatever’s left however you see fit.

Feather your own nest. The worst thing that can happen is that your pension shows up every month. In addition, your investment portfolio would be churning out dividend and capital gain payments every year. You’ll have two sources of income in retirement. How could Future You have any complaints about that?

Sequence of Return Risk

There’s a lot of jargon in the world of personal finance. The more terms you know, the more comfortable you’ll be when it comes to making decisions about your money. Today’s post is meant to be a short and sweet tutorial about the basics of Sequence of Return Risk.

A bear market is one where overall stock market returns are falling.

A bull market is one where overall stock market returns are rising.

This distinction is very important.

Retiring into a Bear Market

Let’s say you retire with $1,000,000. You plan to live on $40,000. So long as your portfolio is kicking off atleast 4%, then you’re golden for as long as you live. Hooray!

You retire. You smash your alarm clock. You wake up when you want with a smile on your face. The only fly in this ointment is that you’ve retired at the start of a bear market. The value of your portfolio drops 15%, which means your portfolio is now worth $850,000 (= $1,000,000 x [1-0.15]).

Your portfolio is still kicking off a return of 4%, but you’re not getting $40,000 per year anymore. With a portfolio of $850,000, you’re only getting $34,000 (=$850,000 x 4%). Where will the other $6,000 come from? Remember, you need $40,000 to fund each year of your retirement.

You’ll have to withdraw the extra $6K from your portfolio balance of $850,000, leaving you with $844,000 (= $850,000 – $6,000). That’s still a decent chunk of change, but eating into the principal had not been part of your retirement plan…

Year 2 of retirement isn’t exactly great either. The bear market is easing, but it’s still a factor. The value of your portfolio drops another 10%. (Yes, it’s possible for the stock market to drop two years in a row.) That $844,000 that you had is now down to $759,600 (= $844,00 x [1-0.10]). Yikes! That’s $240,400 less than what you started with when you first retired.

Yet you still need $40,000 per year to live on, and your portfolio is still kicking off 4%. Sadly, 4% of $759,600 is $30,384… which is $9,616 (= $40,000 – $30,384) short of your needed $40K. So where will that $9,616 come from? You’ll have to take it from your $759,600….dropping your portfolio balance back down to $749,984 (=$759,000 – $9,616). Not good!

Year 3 of retirement welcomes the return of a bull market, and the stock market goes up 7%. Hooray! Your $749,984 is now worth $802,483 (=$749,984 x 1.07). That’s still not enough to kick off $40,000. In fact, your portfolio will only earn you $32,099 (=$802,483 x 4%), which means taking a further $7,901 (= $40,000 – $32,099) from your portfolio.

Do you see the problem?

When you retire into a bear market, your retirement portfolio might not be sufficiently large to cover your anticipated expenses. You may be forced to withdraw money to cover your living expenses when the value of your portfolio has dropped!!! This is a very bad thing because it means that your money won’t be invested when the stock market invariably starts increasing again.

Retiring into a Bull Market

However, if you retire into a bull market, then things are considerably better. Starting with the same assumptions of a $1,000,000 portfolio, a 4% return, and annual expenses of $40K in retirement, check out what happens if the stock market goes up 7% in the first year.

Your portfolio is up to $1,070,000 (=$1,000,000 x 1.07). At 4%, that means your portfolio is kicking off $42,800 (=$1,070,000 x 4%). Yet, you don’t need more than $40,000, so you leave the $2800 invested. Now your porfolio is worth $1,072,800 (=$1,070,000 + $2,800).

In year 2, the market goes up another 15%. Your portfolio goes up to $1,233,720 (=$1,070,800 x 1.15). At 4% return, you’re receiving $49,349 (=$1,233,720 x 4%). Again, you take out the $40K that you need and you let the $9,349 continue to stay invested. Now, your portfolio is worth $1,243,069 (=$1,233,720 + $9,349).

Year 3 is another positive year, though not as positive as year 2. The stock market only produces an average return of 5%, generating $62,153 (= $1,243,069 x 1.05) for you. You don’t change your spending, $40K goes into your spending account and the remaining $22,153 stays invested. Now your portfolio is worth $1,265,222 (= $1,243,069 + $22,153).

See the difference? Retiring into a bull market means your portfolio will continue to grow, so long as you don’t spend every penny of your returns.

Protecting yourself from the sequence of return risk

Like I said at the start, this is just a short tutorial on the sequence of return risk. Other persons far wiser than I have spent way more time coming up with great strategies. One of the books that I would strongly suggest you read for a more in-depth analysis on this topic is Quit Like A Millionaire by Kristi Shen & Bryce Leung. Their book offers a brilliant strategy for avoiding the sequence of return risk – it’s called the Yield Shield and it’s awesome. Another great source of information about how to avoid sequence of return risk is this article from The Retirement Manifesto.

And if you really want to sink your teeth into this topic, check out Big Ern’s Safe Withdrawal Rate series at Early Retirement Now.

If you’re not able to avail yourself of the Yield Shield, then another way to make up for the shortfall between when you need and what your smaller portfolio can provide is to get a job. I’m not suggesting a return to full-time work, but maybe you’ll have to find a part-time job that generates $10,000 per year. A part-time income of $10,000 per year would definitely cover the shortfall in year 1, which means leaving your money invested so that it can grow when the stock market returns start becoming positive again.

And if you’re deadset against part-time work, then there’s always the option of cutting your expenses to live on whatever your portfolio generates. This isn’t the preferred option for a few reasons. First, it’s never fun to cut out the little extras that make life a bit more pleasant. Secondly, there’s only so much you can cut. Thirdly, there’s no room for surprise expenses like a new furnace in the dead of winter. While it’s not ideal, working a few hours a week might be a better financial alternative for you than cutting out expenses that make the non-working hours more comfortable.

So that’s my primer on the sequence of return risk. Retiring into a bear market is fraught with peril, but there are ways to minimize its negative impact on the sustainability your long-term retirement money. It’s best to retire into a bull market. Should you not be one of the people with an accurate crystal ball able to tell you what the future will bring, then I suggest that you read and learn more about how to ensure that your retirement portfolio lasts for as long as you do.

Owning vs. Renting…decisions, decisions!

In the interests of complete transparency, I’m going to say that I am a homeowner. I’ve owned my current home since 2004, and I bought my first home in 2001. I only ever rented for a few years – maybe 2? – before I got my very first mortgage and jumped on the property ladder.

Things have changed drastically in the past 20 years… Damn! I hate typing that out, but facts are facts. Twenty years ago, I was able to buy my first place for $74,000. Fortunately, I bought just before prices in my province went crazy.

I’ve listened to both sides of the own vs. rent debate, and both sides make good points. Personally, I still prefer to own. Why?

When I’m old, I want to have the option of selling my home to pay my bills. Renters do not have that option.

I’ve spent years reading Garth Turner’s advice at the Greater Fool. He strongly advocates that people who own sell today, if not yesterday, so that they can take advantage of the incredibly high housing prices that we are currently seeing in various parts of Canada. He exhorts them to invest their tax-free capital gains, to create a cash flow that will pay for their living expenses, and to become happy, carefree renters. Mr. Turner has written numerous blog posts about the costs of home ownership, and how people routinely discount the costs of maintenance, repairs, taxes, land transfer fees, and all other expenses that come with owning a home. Paying the mortgage is least of a homeowner’s concern. There are so many other ways that a house becomes a financial albatross!

Mr. Turner advocates for becoming a renter, allowing the landlord to subsidize your housing expenses, and investing the difference between rental payments and mortgage payments. I will admit that this perspective is compelling. Having owned my home for years, I am known to refer to it as a money pit. There’s always something that needs to be paid. Renting and living off my investment portfolio does have a seductive ring to it.

…Until I start thinking about whether my portfolio is big enough to handle 20 to 30 years of rent increases. I don’t want to be 75 years old and facing yet another rental increase that means I’ll have to move to a smaller, less desirable location. I know the stock market has returned 10%-12% on average over very long periods of time. That’s all fine and good. Yet, we know that this is an average. Some years, the stock market drops.

If I have a $200 per month rental increase in a year where my portfolio has taken a hit, then don’t I have to liquidate some of my principal to pay my rent? And doesn’t that mean that I’m cannibalizing my portfolio’s capital right when I shouldn’t be touching it? Once the money has been withdrawn to pay rent, it’s no longer able to recover and grow. Selling during a downturn means I’d be decreasing the size of my portfolio at the worst possible time in order to keep a roof over my head.

That is precisely what I should not be doing in my dotage. Remember, the ideal scenario is that my portfolio will always churn off enough capital gains and dividends to cover my living costs.

But what if it doesn’t? What if my portfolio isn’t big enough to churn off sufficient funds to pay for my living expenses once I’ve stopped working? Then what happens? Who comes to my rescue as my portfolio dwindles over the years?

With a house, I believe that I have a few more options. Once it’s paid for, there’s no longer any risk that the bank will foreclose on it. Whew! It’ll still cost me in upkeep and repairs. Those are just a fact of life. However, my house lets me participate in house-hacking if necessary. I can take in a roommate. I can rent my house to someone who needs the space while I live somewhere else. If I needed to, I could sell it and use the money to pay for my long-term care. Or I can die in my own home, secure in the knowledge that no one ever forced me to leave a place where I wanted to live.

I’ve yet to see the pro-renting advocates address the fact that not everyone is able to build a portfolio that is large enough to cover ever increasing rents, and the other costs of living. Mr. Turner’s suggested course of action works wonderfully for people who bought in Vancouver 25 years ago and are now sitting on millions in equity. I’m not as easily persuaded that it works for people who don’t already have a boatload of equity to invest in the stock market. It’s true that a house cannot be sold one doorknob at a time to pay for one’s bills. However, it can be sold all at once and hopefully the money lasts as long as needed.

Life has taught me that there is no one right answer for every situation. If you can build a portfolio large enough to sustain you, then I see no problem with renting. It’s the situation where a large portfolio isn’t in the renter’s future that troubles me. In those circumstances, it’s very difficult for me to believe that renting is better. If the portfolio isn’t sufficiently large to cover life’s expenses, and there’s no home to sell, then what is the renter to do to find additional money?

I will think on it some more. Stay tuned.

Retirement is coming, one way or another.

What the eyes don’t see, the heart won’t grieve…
Anonymous Online Poster

No matter how you look at it, retirement is coming.

And if you’re fortunate, you’ll get to pick when you retire. Should Life have other plans for you, then retirement may arrive unexpectedly. Either way, retirement is in your future. One of the best things you can do for Future You is to start saving today.

This year, the contribution deadline for the Registered Retirement Savings Plan is March 1, 2021. In other words, if you put money into your RRSP on or before March 1, 2021, then you will get a tax deduction that can be used against any taxes that you owe for the 2020 tax year.

Here’s a handy-dandy little chart to show you the maximum amount of money that you can put into your RRSP this year.

What’s that? You say that you don’t have $27,830 lying around to make this year’s contribution?

Do you have $1?

Fear not, Gentle Reader. The numbers listed on the chart are the maximum contribution limits. In an ideal world, you would have no trouble at all socking away this much money.

If you’re not one of the Very Fortunate Ones who can easily plunk $27,830 into your RRSP without batting an eye, then fret not. You will do what you can until you can do better. It’s really not more complicated than that.

If you can afford $1 per day, that’s $365 per year. It’s not a lot but it’s a whole lot more than nothing. If you don’t start saving this tiny daily amount, then I can assure you that you’ll regret your decision. Retiring solely on social benefits will not be comfortable.

At $5 per day, you’re looking at $1,825 per year. That’s not too shabby, but it’s also not the cat’s pyjamas. It means one less snack per day, or one less fancy coffee. (Hat tip to David Bach, who is the author of The Automatic Millionaire. This is one the first books that put yours truly on my current financial path.) Save a few calories – use your kitchen to save some money – throw that money into your RRSP and let it grow over the years.

Kick it up to $10 per day and wow! Now, you’re contributing several thousand dollars in a year. In a lot of places, $10 each day is less than you’d spend on parking your car at work. It’s less than getting a burger, fries and a drink at a fast food place. It’s not a whole lot of money, but it can certainly get you to the retirement you want if you consistently put it to good use. If you don’t believe me, check out what Mr. Money Mustache has to say about the $10 bill.

Pick your per diem.

I trust you see a pattern. By implementing a per diem for your RRSP, and setting up an automatic money transfer, you’ll be improving the chances that you’ll have a financially comfortable retirement.

Whatever amount works for your budget, that’s the amount that you should be sending to your RRSP. Before you even ask, $0 per day is not at all an appropriate amount to be saving.

Once siphoned from your daily chequing account and into your RRSP, your money will grow tax-free until withdrawn. How large will it grow? That’s up to you and/or your financial advisor.

In the interests of transparency, I will tell you that my portfolio is invested in exchange-traded funds with Vanguard Canada and iShares. I’ve gone to a fee only advisor for advice, but I do my own research and make my own investment decisions. I’m currently putting my money into equity products, after having spent 9.5 years investing solely in dividend ETFs. I’m a staunch buy-and-hold investor. That means I don’t sell after I buy. I buy what I believe to be good investments and then I just leave them alone for years and years and years. I still have the bank stocks that my parents bought for me when I was a baby…and I haven’t been a baby for a very long time!

You owe it to yourself to spend some time learning about investing your money. Save your money via automatic money transfers. Invest your money in equity products. Learn, learn, learn – as much as you can! There are books, blogs, YouTube, and people who all have information to share. Then repeat the process. Save – invest – learn – repeat!

Do not procrastinate.

Every day that you don’t open your RRSP and invest your money is a missed opportunity to grow your money in a tax-free environment. This is important because money grows faster when it is not taxed. To be very clear, money grows on a tax-deferred basis in an RRSP and you will pay taxes on the money when your withdraw it. However, if all goes well, retirement is a long way away and your money will grow into a giant pile. While you won’t be happy to pay taxes, regard that tax debt as evidence that you’re not going to be poor in your retirement. Poor people don’t pay taxes. You don’t want to be poor in your retirement.

I digress. Retirement is coming, one way or another. If you’re procrastinating about opening and/or funding your RRSP, then stop! Today’s technology means you can open and fund your RRSP from your hand-computer. You no longer need to go to a branch or talk to a human to complete these functions.

Time waits for no one. Take the steps you need to take so that you can put as much as you possibly can into your RRSP. This is a fundament step that you need to take to better your chances of having a financially comfortable dotage and being able to handle whatever financial challenges come your way when you and your income part ways.