Category: Retirement

Renting vs. Owning

I’ve been a big fan of Garth Turner, who blogs over at Greater Fool, for a few years now. He’s a big proponent of creating cash flows for retirement. Towards that end, he has written many, many persuasive posts about why people should sell their homes, invest the equity, and live off the investment income.

It’s not necessarily a bad plan. For a very long time, I thought it was a great plan.

But…

Lately, I’ve come to question how feasible this plan is for everyone who owns a house. If you’ve been in Vancouver or Toronto for a few decades, then your house could likely sell for a high 6-figure amount, possibly even a 7-figure amount. And if you’ve been there for a few decades, then hopefully your mortgage is gone.

Take that sweet, sweet cash and invest it – in a properly balanced and diversified portfolio, a la Garth Tuner. Now you’ve got cash flow coming in from your investment portfolio to pay your rent. If you’re really fortunate, your investments might even kick off enough money for you to live on. Easy, peasy, lemon-squeezy!

Yet I still have doubts…

My only concern with Mr. Turner’s advice is that not everyone has a home that, when sold, will generate enough money to live on. If a person’s in that situation, and sells, then they face the prospect of ever increasing rents. While their portfolio is growing in the background (hopefully!), it’s quite conceivable that their rental increases outpace the growth of their investment income. In this situation, portfolio income isn’t enough to pay your rent. Mr. Turner’s plan no longer works.

Are people really in a better situation if they’re renting and their employment income has to go towards rent, instead of towards buying more investments, because their portfolio’s returns won’t cover the bills?

In that situation, isn’t the portfolio more like a part-time job than a reliable cash-flow on which one can live and eventually retire? And I use the term “part-time job” to convey the idea that, while the income from a part-time job nice to have, the annual amount of money generated isn’t enough by itself to keep body and soul together.

And if their employment income and investment income are both used to pay the rent, then what happens when the employment income goes away?

Then they’re without a home, and their portfolio’s not generating enough money to cover all that needs to be covered.

Renting might not be the answer

One of my greatest financial fears is being an elderly person who rents. Once employment stops, then all expenses have to be covered by pension payments and investment returns. Pensions are disappearing at an incredibly rapid clip. Investment returns aren’t guaranteed, even if you’re one of the lucky ones who managed build a multi-million dollar portfolio before retirement.

It seems to me that a paid-off home is a cornerstone of a secure retirement. People who own their own homes don’t have to be concerned with rental increases or eviction. They can stay in their homes for as long as their health will allow.

This is great!

And yet…

Houses are so damn expensive today! Even if you’re not in Vancouver or Toronto, a $350,000 house isn’t exactly cheap when you’re earning less than six figures. If it takes you 20-25 years to pay off your mortgage, and your employer isn’t promising you a pension, when exactly are you going to have that extra money to set aside in an investment portfolio?

If you’re not one of the people who earns enough money to pay off a mortgage while simultaneously saving for retirement, then maybe Garth Turner is right.

After all, you might avoid rental increases and eviction but let’s face facts. A paid-off house won’t help you buy groceries and heat and medicine in your dotage. Reality being what it is, a person cannot spend their house one doorknob at a time in order to buy what they need, when they need it. Only money can be spent on stuff. A paid for house represents locked-in money. It’s money that cannot be invested or spent unless the home is sold or otherwise mortgaged.

So what’s the right answer?

I have no idea. The older I get, the less I really know for sure.

For many people, housing is ridiculously expensive and it requires a paycheque-to-paycheque existence until the mortgage is gone. Funding one’s own retirement by creating a reliable cash flow is also ridiculously expensive, yet it’s a task that few of us can afford to ignore.

I can certainly see the allure of living off of investment income after liquidating the equity in your home. But so many things have to go right for a very long time for this plan to be feasible. One, you have to properly invest the money. Two, you have to hang on to your investments even when the market drops during a recession. Three, you have to know what to do when black swan events have a negative impact on your portfolio.

Yet, I can also see the hazards of spending most of your working life paying for a house. One, you don’t have significant retirement savings because it took so long to pay off your mortgage. You didn’t have enough time to re-direct your former mortgage payments towards your investment portfolio. Two, you’re making a long-term bet that you’ll always have an income over the 20+ years it might take you to pay off your mortgage. Three, you forever foresake the growth that your money could’ve provided had you invested it in a well-balanced & diversified portfolio.

Again, I don’t know what the right answer is. By way of this article, I simply want you to be aware of the options, the benefits, and the drawbacks. Start figuring out what’s best for you and for your future.

Whether you choose to rent or you choose to own, make that decision with your eyes wide open and fully aware of the opportunity costs of your choice.

A Faucet of Income

Even if you’re a Singleton like me, the implications of intergenerational wealth may have touched your life at some point. I like to think of intergenerational wealth as a faucet of income that helps younger generations to start their adult lives without debt. It’s a financial tool that allows young adults to master the skills of successful adulthood without being burdened by the yoke of debt.

In my case, my parents were able to pay for most of my education. They did the same for my brother. And had I not moved out during my second degree, they likely would have paid for all of it. I graduated with $15,000 in student loans and was fortunately able to pay them off within 2 years of graduating.

I’ve mentioned before that my parents weren’t rich, but they were long-term thinkers. My “Baby Bonus” cheques were deposited into the bank to buy Canada Savings Bonds from the time I was born. Interest rates were good – the money grew – my (and my brother’s) university was paid for – hooray! This is but one small example of the power of intergenerational wealth.

The parents in my social circle are using Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs) to fund the costs of their kids’ educations. I’ve no idea how they invest their money, but I admire their determination to ensure that their kids have access to this form of intergenerational wealth when the time comes.

This week, I was listening to Beardy Brandon of Bigger Pockets on his YouTube channel. (Rest assured that I’m not getting paid for mentioning this website.) If you don’t know who he is, Brandon is a very successful real estate investor who runs a very, very successful blog teaching other people how to be successful real estate investors too. In one particular episode, Brandon mentioned buying properties for his children and having them paid off by the time that his kids started post-secondary school.

Wait! What?

Yes – you read that right. Part of Brandon’s plan to create a faucet of income for his family is to buy his children a property when they’re young, have it paid off by the time they graduate high school, and use the rental income and/or equity to pay for their post-secondary schooling. Along the way, Brandon’s kids will learn the real estate investment business while having some skin in the game.

Plans are the Result of Dreams Mixing with Money

Intergenerational wealth starts with a plan. This is not surprising. Yet, a plan without the money to implement it remains a dream. If Brandon didn’t have money, then he couldn’t have bought homes for his children. If my parents hadn’t had money, then they couldn’t have bought Canada Savings Bonds for their kids’ education. Sam Walton had to have the cash set aside to buy the first store way back in the day, long before the Wal-Mart empire took over the world and ensured that his kids never had to run a cash register for a living.

What I find so incredible about the stories of intergenerational wealth is that the parents (or grandparents) set a living-and-breathing example of delayed gratification for their children. They are long-term thinkers who find ways to use today’s money to fund the dreams of a tomorrow that may be well over a decade away. I always imagine young parents holding their new baby for the first time and thinking “How are we going to pay for med school?”

The decision by an ancestor to keep a little bit back in order to invest it in something profitable changes a family tree. The parent is taking a leap of faith, although hopefully a well-researched one. No one knows what tomorrow will bring and there are no guarantees that the investment will pay off. However, choosing to never invest in anything is guaranteed to bring a return of absolutely nothing.

Start Adult Life Without Debt

If not for my stubborn decision to move out of the house, I could have graduated completely debt free. My parents had created a faucet of income that would’ve allowed me that privilege. Instead, I made a short-term decision and there was a debt to pay.

Now that I’m well into adulthood, I have a better appreciation of how significant a gift it is to start adulthood without debt. I’ve paid off a mortgage, car loans, and student loans during my time. I took out the debt knowing full well that I had an obligation to pay it back – no argument there.

However, that doesn’t stop me from envying Brandon’s children who won’t have to take out a mortgage for a home. If they want to live in the homes that their father has bought them, they can. Should they decide to live in another home and have the first one pay the mortgage on the second home, they can do that too. And if they want to travel the world, their rental income can fund their travels. In short, they don’t have to take on debt because their father has created a faucet of income for them. It’s a plan that’s 15+ years in the making – another example of that long-term thinking that I was mentioning before.

Intergenerational wealth is a way to avoid assuming crippling debt burdens in your 20s. Beneficiaries of such largesse are able to start their adult lives on a firm financial foundation.

For example, take student loans. For some people, they’re a path to a financially secure future. After all, one can’t become a cardiologist without somehow footing the bill for medical school. However, there’s no denying that student loans can also trap people on a hellish repayment treadmill because they borrowed $100,000 for employment that pays $35,000.

It’s astonishing to me that people as young as 18 are allowed to take on huge financial debts, yet they’re not allowed to legally imbibe alcohol in many jurisdictions in North America.

“I’d like to borrow $30,000 per year for a degree, please. I have no idea how much I’ll have to pay back for these student loans once the interest is calculated. I’m not certain whether the salary of my desired career will allow me to pay off these loans while still saving for a home, a family, and a retirement. I also have no idea how to calculate how much my anticipated monthly repayment will be.”

“Sure – not a problem. Just sign here.”

“And I’d like a beer.”

“What the hell is wrong with you?!?!! You’re too young to drink!”

Play the Hand You’re Dealt

When you have access to intergenerational wealth, then debt isn’t such a significant factor in your life. You don’t have to borrow money for your education. You might not have to borrow money for a home! Just imagine how different your life would be if you didn’t have any debts to re-pay.

The reality is that not all of us are born to parents who have the money to buy properties for us. Some of us have parents who have the money but also believe that we should take out loans or find another way to fund our educations without their help. What can I say? You play the hand you’re dealt and you do the best you can.

Singleton or not, you have the power to create a faucet of income for someone else.

Living hand-to-mouth means that there’s no room for savings. This is a tough way to survive since you’re always living on the edge. Your income is barely enough to satisfy your necessities of life. This is a poor foundation from which you can build intergenerational wealth, but I’m not saying it’s impossible to do so.

You might want to think about how you’d like your money to be spent when you don’t need it anymore. Do you have nieces or nephews? Maybe there’s a neighbourhood kid who doesn’t drive you crazy? Perhaps you’ve always wanted to start a scholarship for kids interested in the things that tickle your fancy?

Even if you’re not a parent, you have the ability to create intergenerational wealth for someone in your world.

Money Mistake – Not Buying Equities

I think I’ve made a money mistake.

According to the personal finance blogs that I follow, the stock market has been on a bull-run since 2009. A “bullish” stock market is one where the stock market is rising. A “bearish” stock market is one where the stock market is falling.

Since 2011, I’ve been busily building my army of little money soldiers and I’ve been rewarded with nice, plump dividend payments every month. I don’t use those dividends for living expenses – instead, they’re automatically re-invested into buying more dividend-producing assets. I’m proud to say that I’ve created a lovely cash-flowing side income for myself that will supplement my other retirement income when the time comes.

After hearing about pension failures and the impacts on retirees, I wanted a source of cash that would allow me to survive during retirement if my monthly pension payment happened to be cut or eliminated. I’m a Singleton. This means that I can’t depend on someone else’s salary or expect that anyone else will take care of me. Creating a portfolio that pays me dividends every single month eases my worries about how to survive if my pension disappears.

That said, if I had invested that same money into the stock market over the same time period, my net worth would be a lot higher. I would be that much closer to early retirement!!! I hate to admit it but I’m realizing that choosing not to buy equities since 2009 was a very big money mistake.

Choosing dividends over straight equity investments was very definitely not the right move to make in 2011. According to the good folks on the Internet, the stock market returns have been higher than the returns on my dividend portfolio. In my defence, I wasn’t as knowledgeable as I am now. I succumbed to one of my many flaws – I’m stubborn. I was utterly convinced that my path was the absolute right one for my circumstances.

So now it’s time to fix this money mistake.

My new plan is to invest in an exchange-traded fund that invests in the global market place. This is an equity ETF and I plan to hold it for a very long time. I do believe that over the long-term, the stock market rises.

One of the wisest things I’ve ever read on the internet was an article that stated that one shouldn’t invest believing that age 65 is a portfolio’s end date. It persuasively argued that one’s investment horizon ends at death, not at retirement. People are living into their 80s and 90s, which means that a 40-year old still has a 40+ year timespan over which to watch their money grow. That bit of wisdom shook me up. I’ll need the growth from my equity investment to power my portfolio until the end of my life, not just until the end of my career.

I’ve also decided not to divest myself of my dividend-producing assets. They’ll continue to grow over the next few decades. I’ve accepted that their growth will be slower since I won’t be adding new money to that part of my portfolio. Once my equity holdings make up 40% of my investment portfolio, then I’ll start to consider re-directing new cash into buying more units in my dividend ETFs.

So my portfolio will continue to churn out dividends, and my new money will go towards buying units in my global equity-focused ETF.

What about the recession that’s coming?

Yes – I’ll admit that the Talking Heads of the Media have been nattering quite a bit about the upcoming recession. It caused me concern for about 3 minutes, then I chose to ignore them. I won’t allow their incessant chinwag to dissuade me from my chosen path.

First, no one has been able to tell me when the recession will start, how long it will last, nor how bad it will be. There’s nothing I can do about the recession.

Second, there will be a recovery from the upcoming recession. There is always a recovery from a recession. I have no reason to think this time will be any different. Much like the recession itself, the recovery’s details are a mystery. No one knows when the recovery will start, how long it will last, and how good it will be.

Third, recessions are a natural part of the economic cycle. Stock markets do not rise forever. They go up and they go down. It’s normal and natural. The best bet is to ignore the hysteria from the Talking Heads, to invest early & often, and to go about the daily business of life.

Fourth, I plan to be in the stock market for the long-term. I’m not timing the stock market. I’m starting to put time into the stock market. The only way for me to have time in the market is to start buying now. I’m going to follow the advice of J.L. Collins, who wrote The Simple Path to Wealth, by buying into an equity product and letting the stock market do its thing for a very long time.

I’m never going to make the perfect investment choices all of the time. However, what I am going to do is continue to learn and think about how best to achieve my money goals. And when I find that I’m making a money mistake, I’m going to stop making it.

When you know better, you do better.

SOS! Funding Your Retirement is an Emergency

This week, I heard a very sad story about how seniors in Canada are becoming increasingly impoverished as they age. They don’t have enough funds to support themselves in their dotage. Here’s the link to the article. I’d encourage you to read it for yourself.

Here’s one of the main take-away’s from the article. If you don’t save for your own future, no one is going to do it for you.

Your employer is not looking out for your financial well-being. Pensions are vanishing. If truth be told, your salary is a business expense that is only grudgingly tolerated. If your employer ever figures out a way to eliminate that expense before you’ve figured out a way to live without your salary, then you will be up shit creek without a paddle. When was the last time a gas station employee pumped your gas?

Your parents probably want to help you, but chances are good that they will need their money to pay for their expenses. Maybe they need nursing care. Perhaps they helped fund your education or had a big debts so they didn’t have a chance to save for their own retirement. Maybe your parents didn’t earn a lot during their working years so they still live hand-to-mouth. If your parents are flush and have promised you everything, you should still save for your own retirement. Inheritances are meant to be received, but they should never be the bedrock of your future financial security.

What about your friends? They may love you to death. You may have the kind of friends who would bring the shovels to help you bury a body without asking any questions. Even friends as treasured as these are not going to fund your retirement. They have their own retirements to fund. At best, you and your friends could figure out a way to buy nice, big house and live together as senior citizens – it could all be very Golden Girls!

As a Singleton, you probably don’t have the benefit of a second income coming into your household. In other words, you generate all the income and the paycheques stop when you do. There’s no second earner to help you bring home the bacon. You won’t benefit from survivor’s benefits or a life insurance policy if your partner pre-deceases you. There’s no back-up salary unless you create one by investing your money today so that you have a cashflow for tomorrow.

****** Stop, Blue Lobster – just stop! What is a “back-up salary”? And how do I get one? Simply put, a back-up salary is a cashflow that comes to you without you having to go to work. Think of dividends. Once you’ve bought the stock, you don’t have to do anything else – the dividends will roll in like clockwork unless something very, very bad happens. Another example is royalties from a book or music. You write the book or the song once – it sells – the royalties roll into your wallet every time the book is sold or the song is played. Think of your back-up salary as money you don’t have to sweat for. Pretty sweet, isn’t it? *******

It’s on you to do the heavy lifting. Should you be fortunate enough to have fat in your budget, then you owe it to yourself to trim it away and to put that money to be better use. Set up an automatic savings plan so that a portion of each paycheque gets squirreled away. Invest in an equity-based index fund or exchange-trade fund. Get out and stay out of debt. Save for purchases before you make them.

If you can max out your TFSA and your RRSP each year, great! If you can’t, then contribute as much as you can. These are registered savings vehicles, which means that your money will grow tax-free while inside them. Money that comes out of a TFSA is never taxed. Money inside an RRSP is taxed upon withdrawal. Remember, you can accumulate money faster if you aren’t paying taxes on it every single year.

When it comes to your retirement, saving money is the factor that matters most. Without savings, there can be no investing. You have to save & invest the money now or else you won’t have enough money later. It’s really that simple.

Absolutely clarity is required for this next point: Simple doesn’t mean easy. Not once in my life have I ever said “It’s too damn easy to save money!”

It’s always hard to save money. There are so many things I want. Temptation – aka: advertising – is everywhere. Truth be told, I like love spending money. You know what else I love? Knowing that I’ll be able to buy groceries after I retire.

If you’d rather not be working in your 70s and 80s, then start saving & investing for retirement today. And if you’ve already started, then good on you – don’t stop. You don’t get a pass on taking care of your financial future just because it’s hard.

It’s up to you. Funding your retirement is an emergency.

The days are long but the years are short. This is an old-fashioned way of saying that time passes by very, very quickly. Even if you think retirement is decades away for you, I want you to believe me when I say it will be here before you know it.

Are the Lessons Still Working?

The older I get, the more I think about the ideas that have guided my life’s decisions up to this point. I ruminate on whether some of the ideas that I’ve held dear for a long time are still good enough to follow, or whether they’ve led me to a place that I’d rather not be. In short, I ask myself if those ideas are helping me or hindering me when it comes to achieving my dreams. One of those lessons that I ponder has to do with investing.

When I was younger, I read Dave Ramsey’s book – The Total Money Makeover. I immediately implemented its principles into my life. This book for put me on a very stable financial path. I was young and inexperienced, so this book helped me immeasurably when I was first getting started. And since I’m older than the Internet, I didn’t have access to the myriad of great blogs and websites that now exist to teach people about money.

Fans of Dave Ramsey will know all about the Baby Steps, which are designed to get you living a life that fulfills your dreams once you’re debt-free. If you’re not familiar with Dave Ramsey, get yourself to a library and borrow his book. You may not agree with him, or you may become a disciple. If you’re uncertain about where to start with your finances, his book is a good place to figure out what your next steps should be.

There is a lot to appreciate about the Baby Steps. I’m firmly in favour of getting out of debt. It’s a fantastic goal for just about everyone. I’ve yet to come across a situation involving revolving credit card debt and then think to myself “Wow! What a brilliant idea to pay 29% interest month after month, year after year! I wish I was doing that with my money!”

Nope! I have never once had that thought. When it comes to getting out of debt, I think Dave’s advice is pretty sound… for the most part.

Never refuse free retirement money

However… I’m not as dedicated to everything that Dave preaches as I used to be. Our beliefs about best practices for your money diverge when it comes to saving for retirement and building wealth. If you read his book, then you’ll know that Dave wants you to stop investing for your retirement until all of your debt except for the mortgage on your home is completely gone.

In my opinion, ceasing retirement contributions is a bad choice for a number of reasons. Firstly, people already have a serious problem with saving for retirement and building wealth. That problem generally takes the form of them not doing it! Secondly, the longer money is invested then the more time the money has to compound and grow in the market. It’s so vitally important to simply start investing so that your money starts to grow as soon as possible!

Thirdly, the debt burden to be paid off could be quite large and it might take several years to eliminate it. That’s several years of missed investing! If you’re an older person who’s suddenly decided that it’s time to clean up your personal finances, then you don’t have the luxury of waiting to invest for your retirement. Finally, if you’re getting any kind of retirement match from your employer, then you’re giving up free money when you stop making contributions to your retirement accounts at work. You should not say “NO!” to free money from your employer!

Why pay more for the same thing?

The second area where I disagree with Dave is in respect of where to invest your money. He is a firm believer in buying mutual funds, preferably ones that invest broadly in the stock market. He urges his followers to invest in mutual funds with long-term track records and which provide 12% return on investment. Since he’s from the USA, he encourages people to invest in the S&P 500. I have no quarrel with investing in the stock market. I just can’t figure out why he wants people to invest in mutual funds instead of exchange-traded funds.

For the most part, there’s an ETF out there that is equivalent if not identical to whatever mutual fund has caught your eye. Buying an ETF instead of mutual fund is less expensive than buying a mutual fund. This is because ETFs have lower management expense ratios than mutual funds do. If you want to contribute to a mutual fund that invests in the stock market, then find an ETF that invests in the stock market. Compare the two and then buy the one that’s cheaper. You’ll be investing in the same thing, for a much lower price. The difference between the MERs for the two investment products is money that will stay in your pocket.

Imagine your investment as a 2L carton of milk. You can pay $2.49 for the milk, if it has the mutual fund sticker on it. Your other option is to pay $0.75 for the milk, if it has the ETF sticker on it. One carton is vastly cheaper but you’re still buying the same milk. Why would you pay more for the same thing?

Until I hear a persuasive argument from Dave on why he prefers mutual funds over ETFs, I can’t ever see myself agreeing with him on where people should invest their money once they’re out of debt.

Investing 15% isn’t enough when time is short

The third area where I disagree with Dave is with the amount of money that he wants people to invest. Once you’ve reached Baby Step 7, Dave wants you to invest 15% of your income for wealth-building. Presumably, you can spend the rest of it in any way that you choose.

Woah… 15% of your paycheque isn’t a lot of money if you have no other debts. Personally, I think this number should be way higher. I’d like to see debt-free people investing atleast one-third of their take-home pay, and ideally half of it! My reasoning goes back to the fact that money needs lots of time to grow to significant sums.

If you don’t become completely debt-free until you hit your mid-50s, then you won’t have enough time to build a super-sized cash cushion. Maybe you’ve got a pension so you don’t have as much interest in building your own pot of gold. If you don’t have a pension, then you’re going to need to fatten both your RRSP and your TFSA as fast as you possibly can so that they can get you through your second childhood.

I think saving 15% is a good enough amount if you start in your 20s. This is because young people who aim to retire at 65 have 40 or more years to invest 15% of their income and watch it grow. However, if you’re starting in your 40s or 50s, then you need to save a lot more because you don’t have 40 years of growth ahead of you. There’s no guarantee that you won’t be a victim of downsizing or ageism once you hit your 50s. Dave likes to throw around a rate of return of 12% on mutual fund investments. The longer your time horizon, the better your odds of getting such a lofty return on your portfolio. If you’ve got a short time horizon, then the growth of your portfolio is going to have to come from your return AND your savings so make sure that you save more than 15%!!!

There’s no harm in saving more. Please do not misunderstand – I don’t want you to lead a life of deprivation while you build wealth. I’m not advocating that you deny yourself some of life’s luxuries in order to build mounds of wealth. Sacrificing all the things that bring you happiness and joy alone your journey simply to save for retirement isn’t a good way to live the only life you’ve got.

I just want you to consider saving more than 15% of your income.

If you have no debt and no mortgage, do you really need to spend 85% of your paycheque? Could you not stumble along on two-thirds of it and still do/acquire/experience most of the things on your want-list?

All Hail the Octopus!

This week, I had the pleasure of reading a fantastic article about saving for financial independence and early retirement that was written by Mr. Tako of www.mrtakoescapes.com***. In this magnificent article, Mr. Tako discusses his surprise that anyone would view his choices as “hardcore” on his pursuit to financial freedom. By following his own plan, Mr. Tako was able to retire on his own terms. What some may view as hardcore, others may view as tweaks. It’s all in the eye of the beholder!

While I loved his article, my take-away was slightly different. I was simply happy to know that every small step makes a difference. Sometimes, it feels like saving and investing is a treadmill that’s going nowhere. The destination is so far away, and why can’t I just win the lottery and be done with it already?!?!?! However, articles like Mr. Tako’s remind me that there is an endpoint and that every little step I take gets me closer and closer to it.

Unlike Mr. Tako, I haven’t had many bad jobs nor many bad bosses. For the most part, my career has a many great attributes. I work with very smart people. My work is mentally challenging. I have autonomy over how my tasks get accomplished. I have a nice office filled with natural light. My office plant is big and beautiful, healthy and happy. I’m even happy with my salary since, without debt, my paycheque is more than sufficient to meet my needs.

Still…

At the end of the day, I want to retire and the sooner, the better. When I’m not at work, I’m much, much happier. It’s as simple as that. I have a great circle of friends – I love my family – I’m a bit of a homebody when I’m not travelling. Working gets in the way of that, despite all of the really great facets of my job. When I work, I’m on someone else’s schedule. I’m doing things that mean little or nothing to me. I’m attending meetings that have little palpable purpose. Despite all of the good things that I listed earlier, working means that I have to sell my time to someone else in order to survive financially. If I can find a way to retire early, then I get my time back.

Much like Mr. Tako, I’ve taken steps over the years to find ways to save on daily costs so that I can retire sooner.

At this point, I’d like to fully acknowledge that there is no one plan that will work for every single person. Each of us has to figure out what we’re willing to do in order to achieve the financial freedom that we want for ourselves.

The first big step in the right direction was my decision to take transit. I gave up the daily drive to work way back in 2001. I’m not a huge environmentalist, nor am I troubled by rush-hour traffic. The commute is the same whether I’m behind the wheel or a passenger on the bus. No – my main reason for choosing transit was so I could save on my commuting costs in order to invest money for early retirement. I’m fortunate to live in a location that has excellent transit service for commuters. For nearly two decades, I’ve driven to the park-n-ride, shown my bus-driver my pass, and have happily ridden in safety back and forth to work.

This one small decision 18 years ago has saved me thousands of dollars because I don’t pay hundreds of dollars each month for parking. I fill my tank every 10-12 days. My insurance premiums are lower, and the wear-and-tear on my car is less that it would’ve been with a daily round-trip drive to work.

The second step in my march to financial freedom arose due to a health concern. A sensitivity to caffeine required me to cut down on coffee during my work breaks. Many years back, I went to my doctor and complained of a racing heart. She asked how much coffee I drank. I told her that I had coffee with breakfast, at my mid-morning break, and during my afternoon break. She told me to cut back to one coffee a day and see how I felt. My doctor’s a miracle worker! Within a week, my heart had stopped racing. The upshot was that I was also saving money to be re-directed to my retirement.

Step #3… In 2016, I took the big plunge and cancelled my cable subscription. Again, this wasn’t a strictly financial decision. It wasn’t a money decision at all! I simply got tired of paying for garbage, so I decided to stop. But whatever would I do with the additional money each month that wasn’t going to the cable company? You guessed it – I funnelled the extra money into my investments!

Finally, in 2018, I made another commitment to myself which has positive financial results. I decided to start taking my lunch to work more often than not. Again, it wasn’t really a money decision. Fast food and restaurant food doesn’t taste as good to me as my own cooking. It suddenly struck me one day that I was paying for food that I didn’t enjoy. Taking my lunch to work earns me a double-whammy: good food to eat and more money saved for financial independence.

Like Mr. Tako says in his article, these small steps don’t feel extreme. They feel normal. I didn’t try to do everything all at once. Knowing myself as I do, that’s a challenge that I would have failed. Instead, I added these changes gradually until I reached my satisfaction point.

How about you? What steps have you taken in pursuit of funding your own dreams?

(***Update 2024 – sadly, this website is no longer available.)

RRSP Season

It’s Registered Retirement Savings Plan season! From now until the last day of February, there will many advertisements all over the place exhorting you to make a contribution to your RRSP.

If you need more detailed information about the rules, then I would suggest that you visit the website for the Canada Revenue Agency. Alternatively, you can talk to your accountant or a financial advisor. This article does not in any way, shape or form constitute comprehensive accounting or legal advice about RRSPs. I am not a professional nor am I giving you any kind of investing advice. This post is a starting point for you to make inquiries, learn the basics, and take responsibility for your future by determining how to use RRSPs to your best advantage.

For my part, I really like RRSPs. I’ve been contributing to mine since I was 21 years old. Every year, I get a tax refund which is promptly re-invested for retirement or put towards an annual vacation. I’m very diligent about automatic transfers to my investment portfolio so I’m quite comfortable with spending my RRSP-generated tax refund on whatever my heart desires.

RRSPs offer tax-deferred growth. You can pick almost any kind of investment to put under the tax-deferred umbrella. On top of that, you might even qualify for a tax refund if you make a contribution. If you’re in a higher tax bracket when you put money in than when you take it out, you’ve saved money on both sides of the transaction.

Remember – it’s tax-deferred savings, not tax-free savings. If you contribute when you’re in the 33% tax bracket, then your tax refund is based on that tax bracket. If you’re in a lower tax bracket when you take the money out, say the 26% tax bracket for instance, then you’ll pay tax on that RRSP withdrawal at 26%. This means you’ll be 7% to the good. Woohoo!

In my humble opinion, RRSPs have many commendable benefits.

However, not every product is perfect. RRSP contribution room can be lost if you make a contribution and then withdraw the money outside of two very specific RRSP programs. Those programs are the Lifelong Learners Plan or the HomeBuyer’s Plan. In short, if you contribute $1000 to your RRSP and then withdraw that money outside of the aforementioned programs, then you cannot put that money back into your RRSP in the future. Unlike the Tax Free Savings Account, which allows for contribution room to be re-captured if a withdrawal is made, your RRSP contribution room is gone forever once you withdraw your money.

Another associated drawback to RRSPs, in certain circumstances, is the creation of a nemesis commonly known as D-E-B-T.

“How can an RRSP result in debt?” you ask.

It’s quite simple. At this time of year, banks love to give people RRSP loans. Customers borrow money, contribute to their RRSP, and then they’re supposed to use the tax refund to pay down the RRSP loan. Whether the tax refund is actually applied to the outstanding balance on the RRSP loan is anyone’s guess. The tax refund goes straight to the borrower who took out the loan and it can be used however the borrower wants it to be used. Concert tickets? Holiday? Extra mortgage payment? Cigarettes? The choice is limited only by the borrower’s imagination and common sense. There’s no requirement for the tax refund to pay down the RRSP loan.

In my humble opinion, failing to pay down the loan with the tax refund is most likely a stupid move because do you know what else belongs to the borrower? The loan payments! If the tax refund is spent on something other than the RRSP loan, the loan payments still have to be made because the borrower put himself into debt by taking out the loan in the first place!

Even if the tax refund is applied towards the RRSP loan, trust me when I say that the refund won’t be enough to cover the principal of the loan which means that the borrower is on the hook for the remaining balance of the loan.

Keep in mind that the banks aren’t lending you money interest-free. They might defer the interest on the first 90-days of the loan, in the expectation that you’ll apply any tax refund towards the debt, but don’t hold your breath. Way back in the Palaeolithic period when I worked for a financial institution, this is what my overlords did for the customers. I have no idea if this is still the practice. However, if you can’t repay the loan in full within the grace period, then you will be paying interest on your RRSP loan until it’s completely repaid.

The other big drawback to the RRSP loan is that it, more often than not, requires more RRSP loans in the future if a person is intent on funding their RRSP each year. A cycle of debt is created – this is bad. See, if you’re required to make loan payments on this year’s loan, then you’re most likely not setting money aside for next year’s RRSP contribution. If you had set aside the money in the first place, then there would not have been any reason for you to have taken out an RRSP loan. Following this logic, when next year’s RRSP season rolls around, then you’ll be more inclined to take out another loan to make your next contribution.

This is an ass-backwards way to set aside money for the future. Yes – make the RRSP contribution. No – do not go into debt to do it!

“So what’s your bright idea, Blue Lobster?” you ask.

It’s simple. Go to any bank’s RRSP loan calculator and enter your numbers. The calculator will spit out a loan payment amount. I want you to set up a transfer from your bank account to your RRSP in the amount of the loan payment. Maybe the calculator spits out a payment amount of $500/mth. If your budget can accommodate this number, great – contribute $500 to your RRSP every month like clockwork. Maybe your budget can only tolerate a monthly hit of $350. That’s fine too – you’ll contribute $350 to your RRSP each month.

The point is that instead of paying money and interest to the bank, I want you to contribute that money to your RRSP. If you were willing to pay the bank some interest for the privilege of borrowing money, then I see no reason why you won’t make interest-free payments to yourself.

Either way, you’ll be setting aside money for your future. Why not do so without going into debt?